fix(rome_js_analyze): additional check for noNegationElse

crates/rome_js_analyze/src/analyzers/style/no_negation_else.rs

@@ -139,8 +139,8 @@ fn is_negation(node: &JsAnyExpression) -> Option<bool> {
             match (expr.operator().ok(), expr.argument().ok()) {
                 (
                     Some(JsUnaryOperator::LogicalNot),
-                    Some(JsAnyExpression::JsUnaryExpression(_)),
-                ) => Some(false),
+                    Some(JsAnyExpression::JsUnaryExpression(inner_unary)),
+                ) => Some(inner_unary.operator().ok()? != JsUnaryOperator::LogicalNot),
                 _ => Some(true),
             }
         }

crates/rome_js_analyze/tests/specs/style/noNegationElse/issue_3141.js

@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
-// valid
+// invalid
 function f() {
     return !!specs.variables ? specs.variables(props) : {};
-}
+}
+// valid
+!-a ? b : c

crates/rome_js_analyze/tests/specs/style/noNegationElse/issue_3141.js.snap

@@ -4,10 +4,33 @@ expression: issue_3141.js
 ---
 # Input
 ```js
-// valid
+// invalid
 function f() {
     return !!specs.variables ? specs.variables(props) : {};
 }
+// valid
+!-a ? b : c
+```
+
+# Diagnostics
+```
+issue_3141.js:6:1 lint/style/noNegationElse  FIXABLE  ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
+
+  ! Invert blocks when performing a negation test.
+
+    4 │ }
+    5 │ // valid
+  > 6 │ !-a ? b : c
+      │ ^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+  i Suggested fix: Exchange alternate and consequent of the node
+
+    4 4 │   }
+    5 5 │   // valid
+    6   │ - !-a·?·b·:·c
+      6 │ + -a·?·c·:·b
+
+
 ```