Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 31, 2023. It is now read-only.

perf: End-to-end Linter and Formatter benchmarks #3570

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Nov 7, 2022
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension


Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
43 changes: 43 additions & 0 deletions benchmark/README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
# Benchmarks
## Getting Started
1. Install hyperfine: `cargo install hyperfine`
2. Install node modules: `npm i`
3. Run the benchmarks: `node run.js`

## Results
Setup: MacBook Pro (13-inch, M1, 2020)

### Formatting
* Rome's ~25 times faster than Prettier
* Rome's ~7 times faster when restricting it to a single core

### Linting
* Rome's 2-3 times faster than ESLint
* Rome is ~20-40% slower than ESLint when restricting it to a single core.

The speed-ups for the multithreaded benchmarks can vary significantly depending on the setup. For example, Rome is 100 times faster than Prettier on an M1 Max with 10 cores.

## Analysis
### Formatter
* Rome's formatter is fast :).
* It should be possible to speed up Prettier. Rome's architecture isn't that different, and native has its advantages, but Prettier should be able to compete in single-threaded mode.

### Linting
* Rome's linter spends significant time building the semantic model, the control flow graph, and matching queries. I'm convinced there's room for improvement ([3565](https://github.com/rome/tools/pull/3565), [3569](https://github.com/rome/tools/pull/3569)).
* Computing the diff for code fixes is expensive. Rome can spend up to 3s computing diffs (not measured by these benchmarks, see explanations below)
* Hypothesis: Rome doesn't use async IO to read files. That's why the single-threaded Rome issues the file read commands one by one. ESLint may be faster in single-threaded linting because it can issue all reads with async IO (so that the OS loads the files in the background while other files are linted). I have yet to verify if ESLint indeed does use async IO.

## Notes

We've been careful to create fair benchmarks. This section explains some of the decisions behind the benchmark setup and how these decisions affect the results. Please [let us know](https://github.com/rome/tools/issues) if you have ideas on how to make the benchmarks fairer or if there's a mistake with our setup.

### Formatting
* Compares the wall time of Rome and Prettier to format all files in a project where all files are correctly formatted.
* The benchmark limits Prettier to only format JavaScript and TypeScript files because Rome doesn't support other file types.
* Rome only prints a summary with the number of formatted files. The prettier benchmark uses `--loglevel=error` for a fairer benchmark so that Prettier doesn't print every filename.

### Linting
* Compares the wall time of Rome and ESLint to check all files in a project.
* Only enables rules that both Rome and ESLint support.
* Rome prints rich diffs for each lint diagnostic, whereas ESLint only shows the name and description of the lint rule. That's why the benchmark uses `--max-diagnostics=0` when running Rome because Rome then only counts diagnostics without generating the diffs. Overall, this results in a more accurate comparison but has the downside that Rome only prints the diagnostic count, whereas ESLint prints a line for each lint error.

27 changes: 27 additions & 0 deletions benchmark/bench.eslint.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
module.exports = {
rules: {
"no-extra-boolean-cast": "error",
"prefer-rest-params": "error",
"no-async-promise-executor": "error",
"no-ex-assign": "error",
"no-compare-neg-zero": "error",
"no-debugger": "error",
"no-delete-var": "error",
eqeqeq: "error",
"no-dupe-args": "error",
"no-empty-pattern": "error",
"no-func-assign": "error",
"no-import-assign": "error",
"no-label-var": "error",
"no-new-symbol": "error",
"no-restricted-globals": "error",
"no-shadow-restricted-names": "error",
"no-sparse-arrays": "error",
"no-unreachable": "error",
"no-unsafe-negation": "error",
"no-unused-vars": "error",
"valid-typeof": "error",
"no-const-assign": "warn",
"for-direction": "warn",
},
};
38 changes: 38 additions & 0 deletions benchmark/bench.rome.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
{
"linter": {
"enabled": true,
"rules": {
"recommended": false,
"complexity": {
"noExtraBooleanCast": "error"
},
"correctness": {
"noArguments": "error",
"noAsyncPromiseExecutor": "error",
"noCatchAssign": "error",
"noCompareNegZero": "error",
"noDebugger": "error",
"noDelete": "error",
"noDoubleEquals": "error",
"noDupeArgs": "error",
"noEmptyPattern": "error",
"noFunctionAssign": "error",
"noImportAssign": "error",
"noLabelVar": "error",
"noMultipleSpacesInRegularExpressionLiterals": "error",
"noNewSymbol": "error",
"noRestrictedGlobals": "error",
"noShadowRestrictedNames": "error",
"noSparseArray": "error",
"noUnreachable": "error",
"noUnsafeNegation": "error",
"noUnusedVariables": "error",
"useValidTypeof": "error"
},
"nursery": {
"noConstAssign": "warn",
"useValidForDirection": "warn"
}
}
}
}
Loading