feat(rome_js_analyze): rule noVoid

[ematipico]

Summary

Implements the rule noVoid

Test Plan

Added few test cases

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for docs-rometools ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	56aceea
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-rometools/deploys/64996726c3fc680008c5cec2
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-4619--docs-rometools.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

[github-actions]

Parser conformance results on ubuntu-latest

js/262

Test result	main count	This PR count	Difference
Total	48863	48863	0
Passed	47810	47810	0
Failed	1053	1053	0
Panics	0	0	0
Coverage	97.84%	97.84%	0.00%

jsx/babel

Test result	main count	This PR count	Difference
Total	40	40	0
Passed	37	37	0
Failed	3	3	0
Panics	0	0	0
Coverage	92.50%	92.50%	0.00%

symbols/microsoft

Test result	main count	This PR count	Difference
Total	6212	6212	0
Passed	1764	1764	0
Failed	4448	4448	0
Panics	0	0	0
Coverage	28.40%	28.40%	0.00%

ts/babel

Test result	main count	This PR count	Difference
Total	639	639	0
Passed	573	573	0
Failed	66	66	0
Panics	0	0	0
Coverage	89.67%	89.67%	0.00%

ts/microsoft

Test result	main count	This PR count	Difference
Total	17224	17224	0
Passed	13121	13121	0
Failed	4103	4103	0
Panics	0	0	0
Coverage	76.18%	76.18%	0.00%

[Conaclos]

Should we accept cases where void is used as a statement?

void f()

This is sometimes used to explicitly drop the returned value of a function call.
However, this is not a widespread pattern.
I think we can keep the rule as it is.

[ematipico]

Should we accept cases where void is used as a statement?

void f()

This is sometimes used to explicitly drop the returned value of a function call. However, this is not a widespread pattern. I think we can keep the rule as it is.

Since this is not a widespread pattern, I think it's better to have a suppression comment that explain the case.