Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

new sea ice data format #219

Closed
sckott opened this issue May 3, 2017 · 0 comments · Fixed by #313
Closed

new sea ice data format #219

sckott opened this issue May 3, 2017 · 0 comments · Fixed by #313
Milestone

Comments

@sckott
Copy link
Contributor

sckott commented May 3, 2017

from email from noaa

NOAA@NSIDC is pleased to announce the release of the Sea Ice Index in GeoTIFF format. GeoTIFF files representing sea-ice concentration and sea-ice extent are now available for both hemispheres at daily and monthly resolutions. The GeoTIFF data are single-band, georeferenced images with an embedded color table to make visualizations of the dataset in GIS programs as easy as possible.

To learn more about these data and to access the archive, please visit the Sea Ice Index web page: http://nsidc.org/data/g02135.

not sure if current seaice() function uses the same data, just in diff. format, or if above is a new source of data too

@sckott sckott added this to the v0.8 milestone Jan 21, 2018
@sckott sckott modified the milestones: v0.8, v0.9 Apr 12, 2018
sckott added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 9, 2019
but wanted to change user interface, so useful i think to change fxn name to make it easier
updated tests
sckott added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 10, 2019
* fix #219 change seaice fxn to sea_ice, painful to change fxn name
but wanted to change user interface, so useful i think to change fxn name to make it easier
updated tests

* change to sea_ice() to allow passing in multiple months, years, or poles
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant