Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initialize the controller manager services after initializing resource manager on humble #1272

Conversation

dyackzan
Copy link

@dyackzan dyackzan commented Jan 5, 2024

Humble version of @saikishor's main branch PR to fix functionality to load robot_description from a topic: #1271

@dyackzan dyackzan changed the title Init srvs after resource manager init humble Initialize the controller manager services after initializing resource manager on humble Jan 5, 2024
Copy link
Member

@saikishor saikishor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

bmagyar
bmagyar previously approved these changes Jan 8, 2024
destogl
destogl previously approved these changes Jan 8, 2024
@bmagyar
Copy link
Member

bmagyar commented Jan 8, 2024

@dyackzan we are happy with the changes but not with the results of the tests. Were tests running fine for you locally?

@dyackzan dyackzan dismissed stale reviews from destogl and bmagyar via a58fe02 January 9, 2024 15:00
@dyackzan
Copy link
Author

dyackzan commented Jan 9, 2024

@bmagyar I did see the tests failing locally for me as well. I just added a commit that gets them passing again

@destogl destogl force-pushed the init_srvs_after_resource_manager_init_humble branch from 381f7aa to 4133248 Compare January 12, 2024 15:07
@destogl destogl merged commit 385293e into ros-controls:humble Jan 12, 2024
12 checks passed
@dyackzan dyackzan deleted the init_srvs_after_resource_manager_init_humble branch January 12, 2024 18:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants