Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add custom rosdoc2 config for ros2_control metapackage (backport #1484) #1589

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Jun 25, 2024

rosdoc2 will be used by the build farm to publish API docs on http://docs.ros.org/en/rolling/p/ros2_control/ which is empty now.

image


This is an automatic backport of pull request #1484 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 62.06%. Comparing base (41723d2) to head (fc46369).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             iron    #1589      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.08%   62.06%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         102      102              
  Lines       11775    11775              
  Branches     8447     8444       -3     
==========================================
- Hits         7310     7308       -2     
- Misses        747      748       +1     
- Partials     3718     3719       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 62.06% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

@christophfroehlich
Copy link
Contributor

I'm stuck here, see ros-infrastructure/rosdoc2#127

@christophfroehlich
Copy link
Contributor

better not fight a soon EOL distro ;)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant