Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Message filters Cache object implementation for python (redux) #599

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 3, 2015

Conversation

esteve
Copy link
Member

@esteve esteve commented Apr 2, 2015

This PR is based on #497. Addresses @dirk-thomas feedback.

@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
# CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE)
# ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
# POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
from _bisect import bisect_right
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Import non-underscore instead?

@dirk-thomas
Copy link
Member

@ros-pull-request-builder
Copy link
Member

Test passed.
Refer to this link for build results: http://jenkins.ros.org/job/_pull_request-indigo-ros_comm/206/

@ros-pull-request-builder
Copy link
Member

Test passed.
Refer to this link for build results: http://jenkins.ros.org/job/_pull_request-indigo-ros_comm/216/

@wjwwood
Copy link
Member

wjwwood commented Apr 3, 2015

lgtm, +1

dirk-thomas added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2015
Message filters Cache object implementation for python (redux)
@dirk-thomas dirk-thomas merged commit 1dcb839 into indigo-devel Apr 3, 2015
@dirk-thomas dirk-thomas deleted the cache-object branch April 3, 2015 19:38
rsinnet pushed a commit to MisoRobotics/ros_comm that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2017
Message filters Cache object implementation for python (redux)
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants