Support for more trace levels?

[thockin]

Hi, I'd love to do a logr (https://github.com/go-logr/logr) implementation for zerolog, but they have somewhat different philosophies on levels. logr uses strictly numeric levels. In playing with zerolog, it seems I can set the global level to arbitrary values (e.g. -2 as a "more verbose trace"), but I can't use arbitrary levels in WithLevel().

For zap, we made a change that allows semi-arbitrary level numbers, and just bypasses fancy stuff like sampling when those are used.

Before I go and try to make this work in zerolog - is that something you'd be open to? If so, any guidance of preferred impl would be helpful.

[rs]

There is already a logr implementation here: https://github.com/hn8/zerologr

[thockin]

Oh neat. But it suffers the problem I described here - it doesn't support V levels higher than 2, which makes it pretty limited. So back to my original question... :)

…

On Thu, Aug 26, 2021, 5:39 PM Olivier Poitrey ***@***.***> wrote: There is already a logr implementation here: https://github.com/hn8/zerologr — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#349 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABKWAVHOLUN2D5SQJSYZTU3T63NDZANCNFSM5CZN4C5Q> . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS <https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675> or Android <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.

[rs]

PR welcome