no Rubinius support

[paddor]

Can't use it on Rubinius because Rubinius doesn't provide ripper. Maybe you can do something along rspec/rspec-support@81e33d4.

Thanks very much.

[paddor]

@searls Any updates on this? Just tell me if it's not possible/planned to support.

[searls]

I'm not a Rubinius user, and I don't plan to address this myself. PRs or
thoughts welcome though
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 18:54 Patrik Wenger notifications@github.com
wrote:

@searls https://github.com/searls Any updates on this? Just tell me if
it's not possible/planned to support.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#15 (comment)
.

[paddor]

Well, neither am I. But I want my gem to run on Rubinius too. :)

How exactly is Ripper used in rspec-given? I see there's rubinius-ast and rubinius-melbourne. Do you think one of them could be used instead of Ripper?

[paddor]

I'm coming up with a hack. The thing is, I really don't care about those detailed failure explanations of natural assertions. All I want is the Then/And block to be evaluated, and if it's false, tell me which test fails. That's all I need. All my natural assertions are in the form of var == value or obj.predicate?, so very short.

[paddor]

@searls Any updates on this?

Some of the specs fail because of another issue. See #18.

[searls]

Hey @paddor, I'm going to close this. RSpec itself doesn't support Rubinius (and according to Myron, hasn't for years), so I don't think there's any reason to make an effort to support it in rspec-given.