-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 103
Extract EncodedString helper into its own gem for greater good? #249
Comments
An extracted gem could certainly be beneficial to the community. However, I don't think we'd be able to use it. We have a general "don't use external gems" rule -- not because we don't trust them or anything like that, but because if we depend upon version 2.x of a particular gem and in a user's project they use another gem that depends on version 1.x or 3.x then they can't use RSpec to test their application. We place a high value on RSpec being usable in any ruby project, regardless of their other dependencies so it's not really an option for us to start depending on more gems. |
I was thinking it could be |
Woops. Hit the wrong button. I was going to say that if it's a gem owned by us with |
It could be |
But if other projects start using it and depend on a certain version, we're back to the situation where users may not be able to run a current version of RSpec due to it needing a certain version of |
Yeah, @bf4 if you'd like to extract our code into a gem you're welcome to, MIT license and all :) but I think @myronmarston's right that it's too much of a headache for us to use it ourselves |
Although @myronmarston we could publish another gem from this repo keeping the code vendored for our use but published separately for others... Does still seem like effort... |
I think I'll mirror it like psych and stdlib ie contribute back B mobile phone
|
Sounds good! Sent from my iPhone
|
Basic extraction done., now at https://github.com/bf4/encoded_string |
ref: mikel/mail#921
I think people could really make use of this.
I'd be happy to do the work, just would need advice on gem name and org to use.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: