Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sorting bibliography #265

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Dec 20, 2019
Merged

Sorting bibliography #265

merged 7 commits into from
Dec 20, 2019

Conversation

DunLug
Copy link
Contributor

@DunLug DunLug commented Dec 14, 2019

Hello,
I wrote an IEEE article using the rticles templates and I needed to custom the sorting order of the citations to be 1, 2, 3...
I modified the template this way and added a citation_sorting option in Index.Rmd yaml section. I think there may be a better solution (for example as a subitem of the citation_package option) but I wanted not to modify the previous options as possible.

Copy link
Member

@yihui yihui left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you also add an example of this option in a comment in the YAML frontmatter of inst/rmarkdown/templates/ieee_article/skeleton/skeleton.Rmd?

Please do the same thing for #263 and #264 (add examples in comments, so future users are aware of these possibilities). Thank you very much!

Copy link
Member

@yihui yihui left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@yihui yihui merged commit 4747502 into rstudio:master Dec 20, 2019
@DunLug DunLug deleted the sorting_bibliography branch February 6, 2020 08:15
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 2, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants