Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update module github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4 to v4.5.1 [security] (release-0.30) #5101

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Nov 17, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4 v4.5.0 -> v4.5.1 age adoption passing confidence

Improper error handling in ParseWithClaims and bad documentation may cause dangerous situations in github.com/golang-jwt/jwt

CVE-2024-51744 / GHSA-29wx-vh33-7x7r / GO-2024-3250

More information

Details

Improper error handling in ParseWithClaims and bad documentation may cause dangerous situations in github.com/golang-jwt/jwt

Severity

Unknown

References

This data is provided by OSV and the Go Vulnerability Database (CC-BY 4.0).


Bad documentation of error handling in ParseWithClaims can lead to potentially dangerous situations

CVE-2024-51744 / GHSA-29wx-vh33-7x7r / GO-2024-3250

More information

Details

Summary

Unclear documentation of the error behavior in ParseWithClaims can lead to situation where users are potentially not checking errors in the way they should be. Especially, if a token is both expired and invalid, the errors returned by ParseWithClaims return both error codes. If users only check for the jwt.ErrTokenExpired using error.Is, they will ignore the embedded jwt.ErrTokenSignatureInvalid and thus potentially accept invalid tokens.

Fix

We have back-ported the error handling logic from the v5 branch to the v4 branch. In this logic, the ParseWithClaims function will immediately return in "dangerous" situations (e.g., an invalid signature), limiting the combined errors only to situations where the signature is valid, but further validation failed (e.g., if the signature is valid, but is expired AND has the wrong audience). This fix is part of the 4.5.1 release.

Workaround

We are aware that this changes the behaviour of an established function and is not 100 % backwards compatible, so updating to 4.5.1 might break your code. In case you cannot update to 4.5.0, please make sure that you are properly checking for all errors ("dangerous" ones first), so that you are not running in the case detailed above.

token, err := /* jwt.Parse or similar */
if token.Valid {
	fmt.Println("You look nice today")
} else if errors.Is(err, jwt.ErrTokenMalformed) {
	fmt.Println("That's not even a token")
} else if errors.Is(err, jwt.ErrTokenUnverifiable) {
	fmt.Println("We could not verify this token")
} else if errors.Is(err, jwt.ErrTokenSignatureInvalid) {
	fmt.Println("This token has an invalid signature")
} else if errors.Is(err, jwt.ErrTokenExpired) || errors.Is(err, jwt.ErrTokenNotValidYet) {
	// Token is either expired or not active yet
	fmt.Println("Timing is everything")
} else {
	fmt.Println("Couldn't handle this token:", err)
}

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 3.1 / 10 (Low)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

References

This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


Release Notes

golang-jwt/jwt (github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4)

v4.5.1

Compare Source

Security

Unclear documentation of the error behavior in ParseWithClaims in <= 4.5.0 could lead to situation where users are potentially not checking errors in the way they should be. Especially, if a token is both expired and invalid, the errors returned by ParseWithClaims return both error codes. If users only check for the jwt.ErrTokenExpired using error.Is, they will ignore the embedded jwt.ErrTokenSignatureInvalid and thus potentially accept invalid tokens.

This issue was documented in GHSA-29wx-vh33-7x7r and fixed in this release.

Note: v5 was not affected by this issue. So upgrading to this release version is also recommended.

What's Changed

  • Back-ported error-handling logic in ParseWithClaims from v5 branch. This fixes GHSA-29wx-vh33-7x7r.

Full Changelog: golang-jwt/jwt@v4.5.0...v4.5.1


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot added the security label Nov 17, 2024
@renovate renovate bot requested review from a team as code owners November 17, 2024 15:30
@renovate renovate bot requested review from jamengual and removed request for a team November 17, 2024 15:30
@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge (squash) November 17, 2024 15:30
@renovate renovate bot requested review from lukemassa and X-Guardian and removed request for a team November 17, 2024 15:30
@github-actions github-actions bot added the dependencies PRs that update a dependency file label Nov 17, 2024
@dosubot dosubot bot added the go Pull requests that update Go code label Nov 17, 2024
@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Nov 17, 2024
@renovate renovate bot merged commit 8436827 into release-0.30 Nov 18, 2024
33 of 34 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/release-0.30-go-git.luolix.top-golang-jwt-jwt-v4-vulnerability branch November 18, 2024 17:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies PRs that update a dependency file go Pull requests that update Go code lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer security
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant