Add debug_assert_nounwrap to unchecked_{add,sub,neg,mul,shl,shr} methods

library/core/src/num/int_macros.rs

@@ -510,9 +510,14 @@ macro_rules! int_impl {
         #[inline(always)]
         #[cfg_attr(miri, track_caller)] // even without panics, this helps for Miri backtraces
         pub const unsafe fn unchecked_add(self, rhs: Self) -> Self {
-            // SAFETY: the caller must uphold the safety contract for
-            // `unchecked_add`.
-            unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_add(self, rhs) }
+            debug_assert_nounwind!(
+                !self.overflowing_add(rhs).1,
+                concat!(stringify!($SelfT), "::unchecked_add cannot overflow"),
+            );
+            // SAFETY: this is guaranteed to be safe by the caller.
+            unsafe {
+                intrinsics::unchecked_add(self, rhs)
+            }
         }
 
         /// Checked addition with an unsigned integer. Computes `self + rhs`,
@@ -648,9 +653,14 @@ macro_rules! int_impl {
         #[inline(always)]
         #[cfg_attr(miri, track_caller)] // even without panics, this helps for Miri backtraces
         pub const unsafe fn unchecked_sub(self, rhs: Self) -> Self {
-            // SAFETY: the caller must uphold the safety contract for
-            // `unchecked_sub`.
-            unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_sub(self, rhs) }
+            debug_assert_nounwind!(
+                !self.overflowing_sub(rhs).1,
+                concat!(stringify!($SelfT), "::unchecked_sub cannot overflow"),
+            );
+            // SAFETY: this is guaranteed to be safe by the caller.
+            unsafe {
+                intrinsics::unchecked_sub(self, rhs)
+            }
         }
 
         /// Checked subtraction with an unsigned integer. Computes `self - rhs`,
@@ -786,9 +796,14 @@ macro_rules! int_impl {
         #[inline(always)]
         #[cfg_attr(miri, track_caller)] // even without panics, this helps for Miri backtraces
         pub const unsafe fn unchecked_mul(self, rhs: Self) -> Self {
-            // SAFETY: the caller must uphold the safety contract for
-            // `unchecked_mul`.
-            unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_mul(self, rhs) }
+            debug_assert_nounwind!(
+                !self.overflowing_mul(rhs).1,
+                concat!(stringify!($SelfT), "::unchecked_mul cannot overflow"),
+            );
+            // SAFETY: this is guaranteed to be safe by the caller.
+            unsafe {
+                intrinsics::unchecked_mul(self, rhs)
+            }
         }
 
         /// Checked integer division. Computes `self / rhs`, returning `None` if `rhs == 0`
@@ -1125,9 +1140,15 @@ macro_rules! int_impl {
         #[inline(always)]
         #[cfg_attr(miri, track_caller)] // even without panics, this helps for Miri backtraces
         pub const unsafe fn unchecked_neg(self) -> Self {
-            // SAFETY: the caller must uphold the safety contract for
-            // `unchecked_neg`.
-            unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_sub(0, self) }
+            debug_assert_nounwind!(
+                !self.overflowing_neg().1,
+                concat!(stringify!($SelfT), "::unchecked_neg cannot overflow"),
+            );
+            // SAFETY: this is guaranteed to be safe by the caller.
+            unsafe {
+                let n = self;
+                intrinsics::unchecked_sub(0, n)
+            }
         }
 
         /// Strict negation. Computes `-self`, panicking if `self == MIN`.
@@ -1179,7 +1200,7 @@ macro_rules! int_impl {
         #[rustc_const_stable(feature = "const_checked_int_methods", since = "1.47.0")]
         #[must_use = "this returns the result of the operation, \
                       without modifying the original"]
-        #[inline]
+        #[inline(always)]
         pub const fn checked_shl(self, rhs: u32) -> Option<Self> {
             let (a, b) = self.overflowing_shl(rhs);
             if unlikely!(b) { None } else { Some(a) }
@@ -1241,10 +1262,15 @@ macro_rules! int_impl {
         #[inline(always)]
         #[cfg_attr(miri, track_caller)] // even without panics, this helps for Miri backtraces
         pub const unsafe fn unchecked_shl(self, rhs: u32) -> Self {
-            // SAFETY: the caller must uphold the safety contract for
-            // `unchecked_shl`.
+            debug_assert_nounwind!(
+                rhs < Self::BITS,
+                concat!(stringify!($SelfT), "::unchecked_shl cannot overflow"),
+            );
+            // SAFETY: this is guaranteed to be safe by the caller.
             // Any legal shift amount is losslessly representable in the self type.
-            unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shl(self, conv_rhs_for_unchecked_shift!($SelfT, rhs)) }
+            unsafe {
+                intrinsics::unchecked_shl(self, conv_rhs_for_unchecked_shift!($SelfT, rhs))
+            }
         }
 
         /// Checked shift right. Computes `self >> rhs`, returning `None` if `rhs` is
@@ -1262,7 +1288,7 @@ macro_rules! int_impl {
         #[rustc_const_stable(feature = "const_checked_int_methods", since = "1.47.0")]
         #[must_use = "this returns the result of the operation, \
                       without modifying the original"]
-        #[inline]
+        #[inline(always)]
         pub const fn checked_shr(self, rhs: u32) -> Option<Self> {
             let (a, b) = self.overflowing_shr(rhs);
             if unlikely!(b) { None } else { Some(a) }
@@ -1324,10 +1350,15 @@ macro_rules! int_impl {
         #[inline(always)]
         #[cfg_attr(miri, track_caller)] // even without panics, this helps for Miri backtraces
         pub const unsafe fn unchecked_shr(self, rhs: u32) -> Self {
-            // SAFETY: the caller must uphold the safety contract for
-            // `unchecked_shr`.
+            debug_assert_nounwind!(
+                rhs < Self::BITS,
+                concat!(stringify!($SelfT), "::unchecked_shr cannot overflow"),
+            );
+            // SAFETY: this is guaranteed to be safe by the caller.
             // Any legal shift amount is losslessly representable in the self type.
-            unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shr(self, conv_rhs_for_unchecked_shift!($SelfT, rhs)) }
+            unsafe {
+                intrinsics::unchecked_shr(self, conv_rhs_for_unchecked_shift!($SelfT, rhs))
+            }
         }
 
         /// Checked absolute value. Computes `self.abs()`, returning `None` if
@@ -1991,7 +2022,9 @@ macro_rules! int_impl {
             // SAFETY: the masking by the bitsize of the type ensures that we do not shift
             // out of bounds
             unsafe {
-                self.unchecked_shl(rhs & (Self::BITS - 1))
+                // FIXME: we can't optimize out the extra check here,
+                // so, we can't just call the method for now
+                intrinsics::unchecked_shl(self, conv_rhs_for_unchecked_shift!($SelfT, rhs & (Self::BITS - 1)))
             }
         }
 
@@ -2021,7 +2054,9 @@ macro_rules! int_impl {
             // SAFETY: the masking by the bitsize of the type ensures that we do not shift
             // out of bounds
             unsafe {
-                self.unchecked_shr(rhs & (Self::BITS - 1))
+                // FIXME: we can't optimize out the extra check here,
+                // so, we can't just call the method for now
+                intrinsics::unchecked_shr(self, conv_rhs_for_unchecked_shift!($SelfT, rhs & (Self::BITS - 1)))
             }
         }
 

library/core/src/num/mod.rs

@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ use crate::hint;
 use crate::intrinsics;
 use crate::mem;
 use crate::ops::{Add, Mul, Sub};
+use crate::panic::debug_assert_nounwind;
 use crate::str::FromStr;
 
 // Used because the `?` operator is not allowed in a const context.

library/core/src/num/uint_macros.rs

@@ -518,9 +518,15 @@ macro_rules! uint_impl {
         #[inline(always)]
         #[cfg_attr(miri, track_caller)] // even without panics, this helps for Miri backtraces
         pub const unsafe fn unchecked_add(self, rhs: Self) -> Self {
-            // SAFETY: the caller must uphold the safety contract for
-            // `unchecked_add`.
-            unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_add(self, rhs) }
+            debug_assert_nounwind!(
+                !self.overflowing_add(rhs).1,
+                concat!(stringify!($SelfT), "::unchecked_add cannot overflow"),
+            );
+
+            // SAFETY: this is guaranteed to be safe by the caller.
+            unsafe {
+                intrinsics::unchecked_add(self, rhs)
+            }
         }
 
         /// Checked addition with a signed integer. Computes `self + rhs`,
@@ -662,9 +668,14 @@ macro_rules! uint_impl {
         #[inline(always)]
         #[cfg_attr(miri, track_caller)] // even without panics, this helps for Miri backtraces
         pub const unsafe fn unchecked_sub(self, rhs: Self) -> Self {
-            // SAFETY: the caller must uphold the safety contract for
-            // `unchecked_sub`.
-            unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_sub(self, rhs) }
+            debug_assert_nounwind!(
+                !self.overflowing_sub(rhs).1,
+                concat!(stringify!($SelfT), "::unchecked_sub cannot overflow"),
+            );
+            // SAFETY: this is guaranteed to be safe by the caller.
+            unsafe {
+                intrinsics::unchecked_sub(self, rhs)
+            }
         }
 
         /// Checked integer multiplication. Computes `self * rhs`, returning
@@ -744,9 +755,14 @@ macro_rules! uint_impl {
         #[inline(always)]
         #[cfg_attr(miri, track_caller)] // even without panics, this helps for Miri backtraces
         pub const unsafe fn unchecked_mul(self, rhs: Self) -> Self {
-            // SAFETY: the caller must uphold the safety contract for
-            // `unchecked_mul`.
-            unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_mul(self, rhs) }
+            debug_assert_nounwind!(
+                !self.overflowing_mul(rhs).1,
+                concat!(stringify!($SelfT), "::unchecked_mul cannot overflow"),
+            );
+            // SAFETY: this is guaranteed to be safe by the caller.
+            unsafe {
+                intrinsics::unchecked_mul(self, rhs)
+            }
         }
 
         /// Checked integer division. Computes `self / rhs`, returning `None`
@@ -1239,7 +1255,7 @@ macro_rules! uint_impl {
         #[rustc_const_stable(feature = "const_checked_int_methods", since = "1.47.0")]
         #[must_use = "this returns the result of the operation, \
                       without modifying the original"]
-        #[inline]
+        #[inline(always)]
         pub const fn checked_shl(self, rhs: u32) -> Option<Self> {
             let (a, b) = self.overflowing_shl(rhs);
             if unlikely!(b) { None } else { Some(a) }
@@ -1301,10 +1317,15 @@ macro_rules! uint_impl {
         #[inline(always)]
         #[cfg_attr(miri, track_caller)] // even without panics, this helps for Miri backtraces
         pub const unsafe fn unchecked_shl(self, rhs: u32) -> Self {
-            // SAFETY: the caller must uphold the safety contract for
-            // `unchecked_shl`.
+            debug_assert_nounwind!(
+                rhs < Self::BITS,
+                concat!(stringify!($SelfT), "::unchecked_shl cannot overflow"),
+            );
+            // SAFETY: this is guaranteed to be safe by the caller.
             // Any legal shift amount is losslessly representable in the self type.
-            unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shl(self, conv_rhs_for_unchecked_shift!($SelfT, rhs)) }
+            unsafe {
+                intrinsics::unchecked_shl(self, conv_rhs_for_unchecked_shift!($SelfT, rhs))
+            }
         }
 
         /// Checked shift right. Computes `self >> rhs`, returning `None`
@@ -1322,7 +1343,7 @@ macro_rules! uint_impl {
         #[rustc_const_stable(feature = "const_checked_int_methods", since = "1.47.0")]
         #[must_use = "this returns the result of the operation, \
                       without modifying the original"]
-        #[inline]
+        #[inline(always)]
         pub const fn checked_shr(self, rhs: u32) -> Option<Self> {
             let (a, b) = self.overflowing_shr(rhs);
             if unlikely!(b) { None } else { Some(a) }
@@ -1384,10 +1405,15 @@ macro_rules! uint_impl {
         #[inline(always)]
         #[cfg_attr(miri, track_caller)] // even without panics, this helps for Miri backtraces
         pub const unsafe fn unchecked_shr(self, rhs: u32) -> Self {
-            // SAFETY: the caller must uphold the safety contract for
-            // `unchecked_shr`.
+            debug_assert_nounwind!(
+                rhs < Self::BITS,
+                concat!(stringify!($SelfT), "::unchecked_shr cannot overflow"),
+            );
+            // SAFETY: this is guaranteed to be safe by the caller.
             // Any legal shift amount is losslessly representable in the self type.
-            unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shr(self, conv_rhs_for_unchecked_shift!($SelfT, rhs)) }
+            unsafe {
+                intrinsics::unchecked_shr(self, conv_rhs_for_unchecked_shift!($SelfT, rhs))
+            }
         }
 
         /// Checked exponentiation. Computes `self.pow(exp)`, returning `None` if
@@ -1878,7 +1904,9 @@ macro_rules! uint_impl {
             // SAFETY: the masking by the bitsize of the type ensures that we do not shift
             // out of bounds
             unsafe {
-                self.unchecked_shl(rhs & (Self::BITS - 1))
+                // FIXME: we can't optimize out the extra check here,
+                // so, we can't just call the method for now
+                intrinsics::unchecked_shl(self, conv_rhs_for_unchecked_shift!($SelfT, rhs & (Self::BITS - 1)))
             }
         }
 
@@ -1911,7 +1939,9 @@ macro_rules! uint_impl {
             // SAFETY: the masking by the bitsize of the type ensures that we do not shift
             // out of bounds
             unsafe {
-                self.unchecked_shr(rhs & (Self::BITS - 1))
+                // FIXME: we can't optimize out the extra check here,
+                // so, we can't just call the method for now
+                intrinsics::unchecked_shr(self, conv_rhs_for_unchecked_shift!($SelfT, rhs & (Self::BITS - 1)))
             }
         }
 

library/core/src/ops/index_range.rs

@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
-use crate::intrinsics::{unchecked_add, unchecked_sub};
 use crate::iter::{FusedIterator, TrustedLen};
 use crate::num::NonZero;
 
@@ -44,7 +43,7 @@ impl IndexRange {
     #[inline]
     pub const fn len(&self) -> usize {
         // SAFETY: By invariant, this cannot wrap
-        unsafe { unchecked_sub(self.end, self.start) }
+        unsafe { self.end.unchecked_sub(self.start) }
     }
 
     /// # Safety
@@ -55,7 +54,7 @@ impl IndexRange {
 
         let value = self.start;
         // SAFETY: The range isn't empty, so this cannot overflow
-        self.start = unsafe { unchecked_add(value, 1) };
+        self.start = unsafe { value.unchecked_add(1) };
         value
     }
 
@@ -66,7 +65,7 @@ impl IndexRange {
         debug_assert!(self.start < self.end);
 
         // SAFETY: The range isn't empty, so this cannot overflow
-        let value = unsafe { unchecked_sub(self.end, 1) };
+        let value = unsafe { self.end.unchecked_sub(1) };
         self.end = value;
         value
     }
@@ -81,7 +80,7 @@ impl IndexRange {
         let mid = if n <= self.len() {
             // SAFETY: We just checked that this will be between start and end,
             // and thus the addition cannot overflow.
-            unsafe { unchecked_add(self.start, n) }
+            unsafe { self.start.unchecked_add(n) }
         } else {
             self.end
         };
@@ -100,7 +99,7 @@ impl IndexRange {
         let mid = if n <= self.len() {
             // SAFETY: We just checked that this will be between start and end,
             // and thus the addition cannot overflow.
-            unsafe { unchecked_sub(self.end, n) }
+            unsafe { self.end.unchecked_sub(n) }
         } else {
             self.start
         };

library/core/src/panic.rs

@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ pub macro debug_assert_nounwind {
             }
         }
     },
-    ($cond:expr, $message:expr) => {
+    ($cond:expr, $message:expr $(,)?) => {
         if $crate::intrinsics::debug_assertions() {
             if !$cond {
                 $crate::panicking::panic_nounwind($message);

library/core/src/ptr/const_ptr.rs

@@ -1021,8 +1021,8 @@ impl<T: ?Sized> *const T {
     #[must_use = "returns a new pointer rather than modifying its argument"]
     #[rustc_const_stable(feature = "const_ptr_offset", since = "1.61.0")]
     // We could always go back to wrapping if unchecked becomes unacceptable
-    #[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable(const_int_unchecked_arith)]
     #[inline(always)]
+    #[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable(unchecked_math)]
     #[cfg_attr(miri, track_caller)] // even without panics, this helps for Miri backtraces
     pub const unsafe fn sub(self, count: usize) -> Self
     where
@@ -1035,7 +1035,10 @@ impl<T: ?Sized> *const T {
             // SAFETY: the caller must uphold the safety contract for `offset`.
             // Because the pointee is *not* a ZST, that means that `count` is
             // at most `isize::MAX`, and thus the negation cannot overflow.
-            unsafe { self.offset(intrinsics::unchecked_sub(0, count as isize)) }
+            // FIXME: replacing unchecked_sub with unchecked_neg and replacing the
+            // unchecked_math flag with unchecked_neg will anger the UnstableInStable lint
+            // and I cannot for the life of me understand why
+            unsafe { self.offset(0isize.unchecked_sub(count as isize)) }
         }
     }
 

library/core/src/ptr/mut_ptr.rs

@@ -1121,7 +1121,7 @@ impl<T: ?Sized> *mut T {
     #[must_use = "returns a new pointer rather than modifying its argument"]
     #[rustc_const_stable(feature = "const_ptr_offset", since = "1.61.0")]
     // We could always go back to wrapping if unchecked becomes unacceptable
-    #[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable(const_int_unchecked_arith)]
+    #[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable(unchecked_math)]
     #[inline(always)]
     #[cfg_attr(miri, track_caller)] // even without panics, this helps for Miri backtraces
     pub const unsafe fn sub(self, count: usize) -> Self
@@ -1135,7 +1135,10 @@ impl<T: ?Sized> *mut T {
             // SAFETY: the caller must uphold the safety contract for `offset`.
             // Because the pointee is *not* a ZST, that means that `count` is
             // at most `isize::MAX`, and thus the negation cannot overflow.
-            unsafe { self.offset(intrinsics::unchecked_sub(0, count as isize)) }
+            // FIXME: replacing unchecked_sub with unchecked_neg and replacing the
+            // unchecked_math flag with unchecked_neg will anger the UnstableInStable lint
+            // and I cannot for the life of me understand why
+            unsafe { self.offset(0isize.unchecked_sub(count as isize)) }
         }
     }