Unused patch warnings when using -Zbuild-std with -Zbuild-std-features=compiler-builtins-mem

[phil-opp]

Problem

There are multiple Patch [...] was not used in the crate graph warnings when building a project using -Zbuild-std and -Zbuild-std-features=compiler-builtins-mem on nightly:

Warning output

warning: Patch gimli v0.23.0 (/home/philipp/.rustup/toolchains/nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/src/rust/vendor/gimli) was not used in the crate graph.
Patch object v0.22.0 (/home/philipp/.rustup/toolchains/nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/src/rust/vendor/object) was not used in the crate graph.
Patch adler v0.2.3 (/home/philipp/.rustup/toolchains/nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/src/rust/vendor/adler) was not used in the crate graph.
Patch addr2line v0.14.0 (/home/philipp/.rustup/toolchains/nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/src/rust/vendor/addr2line) was not used in the crate graph.
Patch miniz_oxide v0.4.0 (/home/philipp/.rustup/toolchains/nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/src/rust/vendor/miniz_oxide) was not used in the crate graph.
Check that the patched package version and available features are compatible
with the dependency requirements. If the patch has a different version from
what is locked in the Cargo.lock file, run cargo update to use the new
version. This may also occur with an optional dependency that is not enabled.

Steps

1. cargo new --lib example && cd example
2. echo "#![no_std]" > src/lib.rs
3. cargo +nightly check --target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -Z build-std=core -Zbuild-std-features=compiler-builtins-mem

(The actual target doesn't seem to matter, the build-std feature just requires that we pass a --target argument.)

Notes

These warnings appeared between d5556ae...2af662e. My guess is that #8834 introduced them. They still happen on the latest nightly.

Output of cargo version:

cargo 1.50.0-nightly (d274fcf 2020-12-07)
release: 1.50.0
commit-hash: d274fcf
commit-date: 2020-12-07

[alexcrichton]

Ah yes this is indeed caused by #8834. There's some discussion on #8962 about the impact of that PR and how we may back it out.

[clubby789]

Are there currently any workarounds for this?

[alexcrichton]

Oh this was actually fixed in #8968, and now it's just updating the Cargo submodule in rust-lang/rust. In the meantime there are no workarounds.