Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Change rustdoc-scrape-examples to be a target-level configuration #10343
Change rustdoc-scrape-examples to be a target-level configuration #10343
Changes from all commits
39e6737
b325a8d
c26ed63
ce9597c
183425f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This currently isn't possible, is it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It isn't possible in that you can't pass
--tests
tocargo doc
. But re: later in your review, if we make it so[[tests]] doc-scrape-examples = true
will proactively include the test target, then this could arise. So it's a bit of future proofing.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Something is wrong here, as it appears that
rustdoc
is not actually returning an error in some cases. For example, an example withfn main() { abc }
returns a 0 exit code, even though it generated an error.I suspect there might be some difference between an error generated during lexing and an error while doing other processing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Rustdoc allows functions without valid bodies. If you change it to something like
fn main();
then Rustdoc will return a nonzero exit code.