-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Some small clean ups. #10416
Some small clean ups. #10416
Conversation
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
crates/mdman/src/hbs.rs
Outdated
let man_name = file | ||
.file_stem() | ||
.expect("expected filename") | ||
.to_str() | ||
.expect("utf8 filename") | ||
.to_string(); | ||
data.insert("man_name".to_string(), man_name); | ||
let data: HashMap<String, String> = [("man_name", man_name)].into(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could this perhaps be HashMap::from([...])
to avoid the need to have type ascription?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will switch (them all) to that in the morning. It is much clearer.
@@ -344,7 +343,6 @@ pub fn registry_configuration( | |||
// `registry.default` is handled in command-line parsing. | |||
let (index, token, process) = match registry { | |||
Some(registry) => { | |||
validate_package_name(registry, "registry name", "")?; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Was this intentional to be removed? (in isolation I don't know what this is doing and it may no longer be necessary but otherwise it seems out of place for a cleanup-style commit)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I tryed to call it out in the PR:
The only thing nontrivial was noticing that get_registry_index already calls validate_package_name.
So the next line calls this function.
@bors: r+ |
📌 Commit 6459ce0 has been approved by |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
11 changes in d6cdde584a1f15ea086bae922e20fd27f7165431..3d6970d50e30e797b8e26b2b9b1bdf92dc381f34 2022-02-22 19:55:51 +0000 to 2022-02-28 19:29:07 +0000: - rust-lang/cargo#10395 - rust-lang/cargo#10425 - rust-lang/cargo#10428 - rust-lang/cargo#10388 - rust-lang/cargo#10167 - rust-lang/cargo#10429 - rust-lang/cargo#10426 - rust-lang/cargo#10372 - rust-lang/cargo#10420 - rust-lang/cargo#10416 - rust-lang/cargo#10417
Update cargo 11 changes in d6cdde584a1f15ea086bae922e20fd27f7165431..3d6970d50e30e797b8e26b2b9b1bdf92dc381f34 2022-02-22 19:55:51 +0000 to 2022-02-28 19:29:07 +0000: - rust-lang/cargo#10395 - rust-lang/cargo#10425 - rust-lang/cargo#10428 - rust-lang/cargo#10388 - rust-lang/cargo#10167 - rust-lang/cargo#10429 - rust-lang/cargo#10426 - rust-lang/cargo#10372 - rust-lang/cargo#10420 - rust-lang/cargo#10416 - rust-lang/cargo#10417
Just some small changes I noticed while exploring the code base.
The only thing nontrivial was noticing that get_registry_index already calls validate_package_name.