Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

docs(ref): Clarify MSRV is generally minor #12122

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 16, 2023
Merged

docs(ref): Clarify MSRV is generally minor #12122

merged 1 commit into from
May 16, 2023

Commits on May 10, 2023

  1. docs(ref): Clarify MSRV is generally minor 

    For the second time in the last week or two, I've seen the wording of
cargo's semver documentation used to justify pushing back against
treating MSRV bumps as minor changes.
See time-rs/time#535 (comment)

The current wording makes it sound like "major" is the default stance
but the [general consensus seems to be around
"minor"](rust-lang/api-guidelines#231).

I held back from changing from "possibly major" to minor" for now as the
above linked policy isn't official yet and it leaves it open for crates
to treat it as major.
    @epage
    epage committed May 10, 2023
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    0e817a1 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history