Do not allow empty feature name #12928
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @weihanglo (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
weihanglo
reviewed
Nov 7, 2023
Crates.io doesn't allow empty feature names. |
|
There was an unintentional regression in 1.60 for this due to the switch to toml_edit which followed the spec more closely. |
|
Oh, did Should we disallow any other empty keys, like dependency names (only relevant when using |
|
Yea, it was disallowed. It was fixed by toml-rs/toml-rs#373, but cargo was already switching. I didn't make the connection that some validation would be depending on that. |
Rustin170506
changed the title
Rustin170506
force-pushed
the
rustin-patch-feature-name
branch
from
5138f8a
to
94ca87e
Compare
Signed-off-by: hi-rustin <rustin.liu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: hi-rustin <rustin.liu@gmail.com>
Rustin170506
force-pushed
the
rustin-patch-feature-name
branch
from
94ca87e
to
d618164
Compare
|
@bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 10, 2023
Update cargo 12 commits in 7046d992f9f32ba209a8079f662ebccf9da8de25..6790a5127895debec95c24aefaeb18e059270df3 2023-11-08 03:24:57 +0000 to 2023-11-10 17:09:35 +0000 - refactor(source): Prepare for new PackageIDSpec syntax (rust-lang/cargo#12938) - credential: include license files in all published crates (rust-lang/cargo#12953) - fix: preserve jobserver file descriptors on rustc invocation in `fix_exec_rustc` (rust-lang/cargo#12951) - refactor(resolver): Consolidate logic in `VersionPreferences` (rust-lang/cargo#12930) - refactor(toml): Simplify code to make schema split easier (rust-lang/cargo#12948) - Filter `cargo-credential-*` dependencies by OS (rust-lang/cargo#12949) - refactor(util): Pull out `mod util_semver` (rust-lang/cargo#12940) - Fix the invalidate feature name message (rust-lang/cargo#12939) - refactor(util): Prepare for splitting out semver logic (rust-lang/cargo#12926) - feat: Make browser links out of HTML file paths (rust-lang/cargo#12889) - Do not allow empty feature name (rust-lang/cargo#12928) - fix(timings): unnecessary backslash when error happens (rust-lang/cargo#12934) r? ghost
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 11, 2023
Update cargo 12 commits in 7046d992f9f32ba209a8079f662ebccf9da8de25..6790a5127895debec95c24aefaeb18e059270df3 2023-11-08 03:24:57 +0000 to 2023-11-10 17:09:35 +0000 - refactor(source): Prepare for new PackageIDSpec syntax (rust-lang/cargo#12938) - credential: include license files in all published crates (rust-lang/cargo#12953) - fix: preserve jobserver file descriptors on rustc invocation in `fix_exec_rustc` (rust-lang/cargo#12951) - refactor(resolver): Consolidate logic in `VersionPreferences` (rust-lang/cargo#12930) - refactor(toml): Simplify code to make schema split easier (rust-lang/cargo#12948) - Filter `cargo-credential-*` dependencies by OS (rust-lang/cargo#12949) - refactor(util): Pull out `mod util_semver` (rust-lang/cargo#12940) - Fix the invalidate feature name message (rust-lang/cargo#12939) - refactor(util): Prepare for splitting out semver logic (rust-lang/cargo#12926) - feat: Make browser links out of HTML file paths (rust-lang/cargo#12889) - Do not allow empty feature name (rust-lang/cargo#12928) - fix(timings): unnecessary backslash when error happens (rust-lang/cargo#12934) r? ghost
epage
added a commit
to epage/cargo
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 13, 2023
This was allowed when switching from `toml` v0.5 to `toml_edit` which started allowing empty keys when parsing TOML. This mirrors the change we made for disallowing empty feature names in rust-lang#12928.
epage
added a commit
to epage/cargo
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 13, 2023
This was allowed when switching from `toml` v0.5 to `toml_edit` which started allowing empty keys when parsing TOML. This mirrors the change we made for disallowing empty feature names in rust-lang#12928.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 13, 2023
fix: Fill in more empty name holes ### What does this PR try to resolve? This is a follow up to #13152 and expands on work done in #12928. This is also part of #12801 as I am refactoring how we do validation so that it parts of it can move into the schema, removing the last dependency the schema has on the rest of cargo. ### How should we test and review this PR? This prevents empty registry names which should be fine for the same reason as preventing empty feature names in #12928, that this was a regression due to changes in toml parsers ### Additional information
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR try to resolve?
Found it when I was working on rust-lang/crates.io#7379
How should we test and review this PR?
See the unit tests and integration tests.
Additional information
Do we have any special reasons to allow empty names? I am not sure. It seems there is no way to use an empty feature.