Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: Add README for resolver-tests #13977

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 3, 2024

Conversation

linyihai
Copy link
Contributor

@linyihai linyihai commented May 29, 2024

What does this PR try to resolve?

This collect the comments from @Eh2406 about the resolver-tests and add a README to it.

How should we test and review this PR?

Additional information

Maybe Fixed #13319
See #11938 (comment)

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 29, 2024

r? @epage

rustbot has assigned @epage.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added A-dependency-resolution Area: dependency resolution and the resolver S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 29, 2024
@linyihai linyihai force-pushed the doc-resolver-tests branch 4 times, most recently from f23c289 to ffebf93 Compare May 29, 2024 08:36
@weihanglo
Copy link
Member

r? Eh2406

@rustbot rustbot assigned Eh2406 and unassigned epage May 29, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@Eh2406 Eh2406 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you so much for this documentation work. I have A couple of Nits about grammar. But overall it looks like a good next step.

crates/resolver-tests/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
## The aim

This crate aims to test the resolution of cargo's resolver. It implements a [SAT solver](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAT_solver) to compare resolution of cargo's resolver.
This ensures that cargo's dependency resolution is valid on the [SAT](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_satisfiability_problem).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

- on the [SAT]
+ by lowering to [SAT problem]

not sure exactly what the clearest wording is here.

crates/resolver-tests/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
crates/resolver-tests/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: The marked PR is awaiting some action (such as code changes) from the PR author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 29, 2024
@linyihai
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rustbot ready

@Eh2406 Thank you for your review

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: The marked PR is awaiting some action (such as code changes) from the PR author. labels May 30, 2024
@Eh2406
Copy link
Contributor

Eh2406 commented May 31, 2024

Thank you!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 31, 2024

📌 Commit 861429b has been approved by Eh2406

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 31, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 31, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 861429b with merge 9041049...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2024
doc: Add README for resolver-tests

### What does this PR try to resolve?

This collect the comments from `@Eh2406` about the resolver-tests and add a README to it.

### How should we test and review this PR?

### Additional information

Maybe Fixed #13319
See  #11938 (comment)
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 31, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Eh2406
Pushing 9041049 to master...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 31, 2024

👀 Test was successful, but fast-forwarding failed: 422 1 review requesting changes by reviewers with write access.

@weihanglo
Copy link
Member

@bors retry

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 31, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 861429b with merge 703b520...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2024
doc: Add README for resolver-tests

### What does this PR try to resolve?

This collect the comments from `@Eh2406` about the resolver-tests and add a README to it.

### How should we test and review this PR?

### Additional information

Maybe Fixed #13319
See  #11938 (comment)
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 31, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Eh2406
Pushing 703b520 to master...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 31, 2024

👀 Test was successful, but fast-forwarding failed: 422 1 review requesting changes by reviewers with write access.

@weihanglo
Copy link
Member

@Eh2406 I guess you need to approve the PR. bors is complaining

@weihanglo weihanglo requested a review from Eh2406 May 31, 2024 20:07
Copy link
Contributor

@Eh2406 Eh2406 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's make the bots happy

@Eh2406
Copy link
Contributor

Eh2406 commented Jun 3, 2024

@bors retry

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 3, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 861429b with merge d503f74...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 3, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Eh2406
Pushing d503f74 to master...

1 similar comment
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 3, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Eh2406
Pushing d503f74 to master...

@bors bors merged commit d503f74 into rust-lang:master Jun 3, 2024
21 checks passed
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 3, 2024

👀 Test was successful, but fast-forwarding failed: 422 Changes must be made through a pull request.

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2024
Update cargo

9 commits in 7a6fad0984d28c8330974636972aa296b67c4513..34a6a87d8a2330d8c9d578f927489689328a652d
2024-05-31 22:26:03 +0000 to 2024-06-04 15:31:01 +0000
- Silence the warning about forgetting the vendoring (rust-lang/cargo#13886)
- fix(vendor): Ensure sort happens for vendor (rust-lang/cargo#14004)
- fix(add): Avoid escaping double-quotes by using string literals (rust-lang/cargo#14006)
- refactor(source): Split `RecursivePathSource` out of `PathSource` (rust-lang/cargo#13993)
- doc: Add README for resolver-tests (rust-lang/cargo#13977)
- Allows the default git/gitoxide configuration to be obtained from the ENV and config (rust-lang/cargo#13687)
- refactor: Transition direct assertions from cargo-test-support to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#13980)
- Fix: Skip deserialization of unrelated fields with overlapping name (rust-lang/cargo#14000)
- chore(deps): update alpine docker tag to v3.20 (rust-lang/cargo#13996)

r? ghost
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.80.0 milestone Jun 5, 2024
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust-clippy that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2024
Update cargo

9 commits in 7a6fad0984d28c8330974636972aa296b67c4513..34a6a87d8a2330d8c9d578f927489689328a652d
2024-05-31 22:26:03 +0000 to 2024-06-04 15:31:01 +0000
- Silence the warning about forgetting the vendoring (rust-lang/cargo#13886)
- fix(vendor): Ensure sort happens for vendor (rust-lang/cargo#14004)
- fix(add): Avoid escaping double-quotes by using string literals (rust-lang/cargo#14006)
- refactor(source): Split `RecursivePathSource` out of `PathSource` (rust-lang/cargo#13993)
- doc: Add README for resolver-tests (rust-lang/cargo#13977)
- Allows the default git/gitoxide configuration to be obtained from the ENV and config (rust-lang/cargo#13687)
- refactor: Transition direct assertions from cargo-test-support to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#13980)
- Fix: Skip deserialization of unrelated fields with overlapping name (rust-lang/cargo#14000)
- chore(deps): update alpine docker tag to v3.20 (rust-lang/cargo#13996)

r? ghost
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-dependency-resolution Area: dependency resolution and the resolver S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add readme to resolver-tests crate
6 participants