-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Proptest/Resolver move test helper functions to support #6103
Conversation
r? @matklad (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
Could the "cx" => "context" rename be left out? I haven't found historically that it makes reading code all that much easier and it's much nicer (subjectively in my opinion) to use |
done |
@bors: r+ |
📌 Commit 6562123 has been approved by |
⌛ Testing commit 6562123 with merge 26962e7cba7975b1a25cac88b7559c32e6d6a474... |
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
@bors: retry |
Proptest/Resolver move test helper functions to support This moves all the code in `tests/testsuite/resolve.rs` that is not tests of cargo to ` tests/testsuite/support/resolve.rs`. (follow up to #5921) This also clears up some inconsistencies in naming between local variables in `activate_deps_loop` and `BacktrackFrame`. (follow up to #6097) This is a true refactoring, nothing about the executable has changed.
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
This moves all the code in
tests/testsuite/resolve.rs
that is not tests of cargo totests/testsuite/support/resolve.rs
. (follow up to #5921)This also clears up some inconsistencies in naming between local variables in
activate_deps_loop
andBacktrackFrame
. (follow up to #6097) This is a true refactoring, nothing about the executable has changed.