Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add --dry-run option to cargo update #6371

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 12, 2018
Merged

Conversation

matklad
Copy link
Member

@matklad matklad commented Dec 3, 2018

Hi!

This is just an idea, but what if we had a --dry-run argument for cargo update, which shows which crates would be updated, without actually writing the lockfile? If this seems useful, I'll write the tests and such. If we can leave without it, feel free to close.

Context: at ferrous-systems, we put together a small tool to review the source code changes between different versions of the same crate. This obviously was inspired by the most recent npm incident. While implementing the tool, I thought that having --dry-run might also be useful for folks who a cautious about updating. IE, you could run cargo update --dry-run once to see what could be updated, and follow up with a series of update -p --precise, to do the update in minimal steps, reviewing the actual source each time.

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @alexcrichton

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

This sounds like a fantastic idea to me, others on @rust-lang/cargo have thoughts?

@joshtriplett
Copy link
Member

Seems like a great idea.

@matklad
Copy link
Member Author

matklad commented Dec 6, 2018

Added the test.

Should we feature gate this? I'd say no: this is more-or-less UI-only features, so there's no new functionality to stabilize, and feature gate would seem like a procedural overhead. But of course adding a feature gate is not a big deal, will gladly do that if necessary.

@withoutboats
Copy link
Contributor

Since we already have dry-run on other commands, I don't think we need to feature gate this. we should probably get a full team check off though

@rfcbot fcp merge

@withoutboats withoutboats added the T-cargo Team: Cargo label Dec 6, 2018
@withoutboats
Copy link
Contributor

@rfcbot fcp merge

@rfcbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rfcbot commented Dec 6, 2018

Team member @withoutboats has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged teams:

No concerns currently listed.

Once a majority of reviewers approve (and none object), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up!

See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me.

@matklad
Copy link
Member Author

matklad commented Dec 6, 2018

Since we already have dry-run on other commands,

Pedantic correction: there's a single command with --dry-run, cargo publish :-)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 8, 2018

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #6400) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@matklad
Copy link
Member Author

matklad commented Dec 12, 2018

Fun fact: cargo update --locked is basically cargo update --dry-run.

@nrc
Copy link
Member

nrc commented Dec 12, 2018

Discussed in our meeting today. One question was about the exit code, should we return success if the Cargo.lock would have been updated? (Although cargo update --locked gives that). But overall the feeling was positive.

@nrc nrc merged commit 4786249 into rust-lang:master Dec 12, 2018
@Eh2406
Copy link
Contributor

Eh2406 commented Dec 12, 2018

@nrc did you mean to merge without bors?

@nrc
Copy link
Member

nrc commented Dec 12, 2018

@nrc did you mean to merge without bors?

Whoops, I did not.

@matklad matklad deleted the update-dry-run branch December 12, 2018 21:49
bors added a commit to rust-lang/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 29, 2018
Update cargo, rls, miri

Update cargo, rls, miri

Added `rustc-workspace-hack` to miri so that it shares the same features for serde as other tools.

cc @alexcrichton

## cargo

25 commits in 2cf1f5dda2f7ed84e94c4d32f643e0f1f15352f0..0d1f1bbeabd5b43a7f3ecfa16540af8e76d5efb4
2018-12-11 03:44:04 +0000 to 2018-12-19 14:45:14 +0000
- Remove Stale bot's configuration (rust-lang/cargo#6463)
- Add labels to issue templates (rust-lang/cargo#6464)
- Fix new man page links. (rust-lang/cargo#6459)
- Fix metabuild compile errors with --message-format=json. (rust-lang/cargo#6432)
- Support alt-registry names in [patch] table. (rust-lang/cargo#6456)
- Update the rustup URL (rust-lang/cargo#6455)
- New man pages. (rust-lang/cargo#6405)
- Reify the DepFingerprint type (rust-lang/cargo#6451)
- Extract Fingerprint::new (rust-lang/cargo#6449)
- Upgrade the metabuild to Rust 2018 (rust-lang/cargo#6448)
- Make edition comparing code consistent (rust-lang/cargo#6450)
- Document `name` and `authors` in [package] (rust-lang/cargo#6447)
- Travis: only use mdbook 0.1.7. (rust-lang/cargo#6443)
- Update git2-curl requirement from 0.8.1 to 0.9.0 (rust-lang/cargo#6439)
- Update git2 requirement from 0.7.5 to 0.8.0 (rust-lang/cargo#6438)
- Display errors when `cargo fix` fails. (rust-lang/cargo#6419)
- cargo fix: fix targets with shared sources. (rust-lang/cargo#6434)
- Fix panic-in-panic in tests. (rust-lang/cargo#6431)
- More Rust 2018 edition cleanups (rust-lang/cargo#6422)
- Cleanup some trait impls for SourceId (rust-lang/cargo#6429)
- Remove a nightly check from doc tests (rust-lang/cargo#6427)
- Replace CargoError with failure::Error (rust-lang/cargo#6425)
- Allow testsuite warnings in dev (rust-lang/cargo#6426)
- add `--dry-run` option to cargo update (rust-lang/cargo#6371)
- Migrate to some Rust 2018 idioms (rust-lang/cargo#6416)

## rls

16 commits in bd5b899afb05e14d33e210ede3da241ca1ca088f..6f5e4bba7b1586fca6e0ea7724cadb5683b2f308
2018-12-10 08:53:00 +0100 to 2018-12-21 17:11:08 +0100
- Update jsonrpc-core (rust-lang/rls#1206)
- Use `home_dir` from `home` crate (rust-lang/rls#1207)
- Update cargo. (rust-lang/rls#1204)
- Fix deprecated `trim_{left,right}` warnings (rust-lang/rls#1203)
- Respect ${CARGO,RUSTUP}_HOME for tooltip relative dirs (rust-lang/rls#1201)
- Separate tooltip tests that require Racer fallback (rust-lang/rls#1200)
- tests: Don't generate tooltip results in tests/fixtures (rust-lang/rls#1199)
- Overhaul fixture handling in tests (rust-lang/rls#1190)
- Don't return symbols with empty names (rust-lang/rls#1193)
- Don't check AppVeyor CI status for bors
- Properly infer full_docs (rust-lang/rls#1192)
- Update cargo (rust-lang/rls#1191)
- Improve hover test_tooltip tests (rust-lang/rls#1175)
- Fix unused warnings (rust-lang/rls#1185)
- Workaround rust-lang/rls#703 to prevent obscure failures due to sccache. (rust-lang/rls#1177)
- Disable travis cache (rust-lang/rls#1182)

## miri

14 commits in bccadeb..6c2fc6d
2018-12-08 11:07:22 +0100 to 2018-12-26 14:28:25 +0100
- use memory::check_bounds_ptr for offset check (rust-lang/miri#589)
- Fix comparing function pointers (rust-lang/miri#587)
- fix for infallible allocation (rust-lang/miri#586)
- fix test for latest nightly (rust-lang/miri#585)
- Treat ref-to-raw cast like a reborrow: do a special kind of retag (rust-lang/miri#572)
- Test cargo-miri on Windows (rust-lang/miri#578)
- Cargo miri tweaks and test that we can exclude tests (rust-lang/miri#580)
- Fix cargo miri test (rust-lang/miri#550)
- fix for latest nightly (rust-lang/miri#574)
- Add rustc-workspace-hack. (rust-lang/miri#575)
- use RUSTC_WRAPPER for the cargo hook (rust-lang/miri#573)
- do not auto-detect the targets in the sysroot, instead specify target manually through env var (rust-lang/miri#570)
- Cleanup: Avoid repeating signatures, get rid of to_bytes hack (rust-lang/miri#568)
- Support building and running with full MIR on foreign architectures, drop support for missing MIR (rust-lang/miri#566)
@ehuss ehuss added this to the 1.33.0 milestone Feb 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
T-cargo Team: Cargo
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants