Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix spurious Windows errors with switch_features_rerun. #6561

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 18, 2019

Conversation

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @nrc

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

/// method to run the executable. Each time you call this,
/// use a new name for `dst`.
/// See https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/5481
pub fn safely_rename_run(&self, src: &str, dst: &str) -> Execs {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👨‍🎨 maybe just called run and with a name automatically derived from src?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea, it's a bit wordy. However, I don't want to infer that this is a normal way of running an executable. I dropped the "safely" bit.

To derive the name, it would need to maintain state somewhere to keep the name unique. Project isn't generally mutable, so it seemed a bit awkward. So I'm unsure if there's a clean way to do that.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea, it's a bit wordy. However, I don't want to infer that this is a normal way of running an executable. I dropped the "safely" bit.

It avoids a pitfall on Windows, under certain circumstances. If there's no penalty hit I wouldn't mind people using it as the normal way of running an executable. WDYT?

To derive the name, it would need to maintain state somewhere to keep the name unique. Project isn't generally mutable, so it seemed a bit awkward. So I'm unsure if there's a clean way to do that.

I'd just set up another one of these as a run naming counter:

static NEXT_ID: AtomicUsize = ATOMIC_USIZE_INIT;
thread_local!(static TASK_ID: usize = NEXT_ID.fetch_add(1, Ordering::SeqCst));

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would prefer if normal execution goes through cargo run. It's a somewhat different codepath which has had some issues in the past, so I think it's good for it to be fully exercised. cargo run is also a bit more convenient to use.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, I see.

@nrc nrc assigned dwijnand and unassigned nrc Jan 18, 2019
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+

Thanks so much for tracking this down!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 18, 2019

📌 Commit 2a1adb3 has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 18, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 2a1adb3 with merge 74bac357a142a8563edee44ec7bd2bf9b2fa2740...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 18, 2019

💔 Test failed - checks-travis

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: retry

cc @Eh2406 looks like that spurious failure is resolver related?

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 18, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 2a1adb3 with merge 286896f...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 18, 2019

☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: alexcrichton
Pushing 286896f to master...

@bors bors merged commit 2a1adb3 into rust-lang:master Jan 18, 2019
bors added a commit to rust-lang/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2019
Update cargo

Pull in fix for #57774.

6 commits in ffe65875fd05018599ad07e7389e99050c7915be..907c0febe7045fa02dff2a35c5e36d3bd59ea50d
2019-01-17 23:57:50 +0000 to 2019-01-20 22:31:07 +0000
- Put mtime-on-use behind a feature flag. (rust-lang/cargo#6573)
- Fix a typo in the unstable docs (rust-lang/cargo#6569)
- Perhaps you meant: foo, bar or foobar (rust-lang/cargo#6550)
- Refactor: Create uninstall submodule (rust-lang/cargo#6557)
- Fix spurious Windows errors with switch_features_rerun. (rust-lang/cargo#6561)
- Stop building on master on Travis. (rust-lang/cargo#6562)

r? @Mark-Simulacrum
@ehuss ehuss added this to the 1.34.0 milestone Feb 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants