Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

When running cargo package -l do not check for dependencies #6729

Conversation

ignatenkobrain
Copy link
Contributor

It doesn't make sense and is also fixing problem when one overrides
crates.io registry with a folder and optional dependencies are missing.

Signed-off-by: Igor Gnatenko i.gnatenko.brain@gmail.com

It doesn't make sense and is also fixing problem when one overrides
crates.io registry with a folder and optional dependencies are missing.

Signed-off-by: Igor Gnatenko <i.gnatenko.brain@gmail.com>
@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @alexcrichton

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@dwijnand
Copy link
Member

Could you try to capture the behaviour change in a test, please?

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

In addition to what @dwijnand mentioned, could the call to resolve_ws be moved down below the already existent if branch for opts.list to make it clear that it's only available afterwards?

@ehuss ehuss added the S-waiting-on-author Status: The marked PR is awaiting some action (such as code changes) from the PR author. label Mar 15, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 18, 2019

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #6840) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

I'm gonna close this to help clear out the queue and it's been inactive for some time now, but it can of course be resubmitted!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-author Status: The marked PR is awaiting some action (such as code changes) from the PR author.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants