Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add unit-graph JSON output. #7977

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 17, 2020
Merged

Add unit-graph JSON output. #7977

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 17, 2020

Conversation

ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

@ehuss ehuss commented Mar 8, 2020

This adds a --unit-graph flag that will emit a JSON object of Cargo's internal build graph. See unstable.md for more details.

The primary motivator is to provide an accurate picture of which features are set. With the new feature resolver it is not possible to properly represent the features in the cargo metadata structure, because features are no longer unified. Also, features selected depend on the command, and exactly which packages are being built. To handle that in cargo metadata, it would need to add a "mode" flag, and a superset of flags for all build commands (test, check, build, etc.). To me that seemed like a difficult path to take.

This may also be helpful for making visualizations of the true dependencies. cargo metadata doesn't show the intra-package dependencies like build scripts or test units, and walking the cargo metadata graph correctly isn't always obvious.

This initial concept exposes almost all of the fields. That may be a little too much, but I imagine we could always trim it before stabilizing. This structure also has a high risk of being unstable, since it has a good chance of changing form in the future. I figure that can be addressed with documentation emphasizing that it may change and we may not always provide backwards-compatibility (though we will try if it is not too much burden).

This could also potentially be extended in the future to include things like artifact paths, or "freshness", if we'd like to.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

This looks quite good to me!

Mind adding to the unstable docs documentation the info you have about the original motivation (features and units)? I didn't actually realize what the motivation was until after I read the PR and then read the description (I know, a bit backwards on my end...)

Other than that this all seems pretty lightweight and flexible in the sense that it won't be a burden on us while it's not stabilized and it has a comfy path to stabilization too.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 14, 2020

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #7533) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-author Status: The marked PR is awaiting some action (such as code changes) from the PR author. label Mar 14, 2020
@ehuss
Copy link
Contributor Author

ehuss commented Mar 15, 2020

Updated docs (and added tracking issue).

@ehuss ehuss added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: The marked PR is awaiting some action (such as code changes) from the PR author. labels Mar 16, 2020
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 17, 2020

📌 Commit 4107872 has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 17, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 17, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 4107872 with merge 1fc0630...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 17, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-azure
Approved by: alexcrichton
Pushing 1fc0630 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 1fc0630 into rust-lang:master Mar 17, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2020
Update cargo

Update cargo

21 commits in bda50510d1daf6e9c53ad6ccf603da6e0fa8103f..7019b3ed3d539db7429d10a343b69be8c426b576
2020-03-02 18:05:34 +0000 to 2020-03-17 21:02:00 +0000
- Run through clippy (rust-lang/cargo#8015)
- Fix config profiles using "dev" in `cargo test`. (rust-lang/cargo#8012)
- Run CI on all PRs. (rust-lang/cargo#8011)
- Add unit-graph JSON output. (rust-lang/cargo#7977)
- Split workspace/validate() into multiple functions (rust-lang/cargo#8008)
- Use Option::as_deref (rust-lang/cargo#8005)
- De-duplicate edges (rust-lang/cargo#7993)
- Revert "Disable preserving mtimes on archives" (rust-lang/cargo#7935)
- Close the front door for clippy but open the back (rust-lang/cargo#7533)
- Fix CHANGELOG.md typos (rust-lang/cargo#7999)
- Update changelog note about crate-versions flag. (rust-lang/cargo#7998)
- Bump to 0.45.0, update changelog (rust-lang/cargo#7997)
- Bump libgit2 dependencies (rust-lang/cargo#7996)
- Avoid buffering large amounts of rustc output. (rust-lang/cargo#7838)
- Add "Updating" status for git submodules. (rust-lang/cargo#7989)
- WorkspaceResolve: Use descriptive lifetime label. (rust-lang/cargo#7990)
- Support old html anchors in manifest chapter. (rust-lang/cargo#7983)
- Don't create hardlink for library test and integrations tests, fixing rust-lang/cargo#7960 (rust-lang/cargo#7965)
- Partially revert change to filter debug_assertions. (rust-lang/cargo#7970)
- Try to better handle restricted crate names. (rust-lang/cargo#7959)
- Fix bug with new feature resolver and required-features. (rust-lang/cargo#7962)
@ehuss ehuss added this to the 1.44.0 milestone Feb 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants