Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch to github actions #8467

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

This commit switches our CI from Azure Pipelines to GitHub Actions. The intention here is to follow the "idiomatic" provider of CI for rust-lang, and otherwise GitHub Actions is better integrated with GitHub's UI right now too.

I'll need to tweak bors to actually @bors: r+ this to have it successfully get merged, but I think it'd be good to get some review first.

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @ehuss

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 8, 2020
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rust-lang/rust/master/src/tools/linkchecker/linkcheck.sh
sh linkcheck.sh --all cargo

success:
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is some trickery here to get bors to work. Bors can only listen for one status on a PR, but GitHub Actions creates a status-per-builder. This "bors build finished" status is intended to be the signal to bors that the build has finished. This is mostly just copied from rust-lang/rust. I'm hoping that bors-rs may make this a bit nicer so we don't have to do this in the future.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

I think the corresponding bors changes look like rust-lang/rust-central-station#890

.github/workflows/main.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/main.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/main.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

Ok, should now be 100% faithful to azure pipelines!

@ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

ehuss commented Jul 10, 2020

Thanks! r=me if you're ready. (I'm not sure if you have to do the bors change concurrently.)

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

Ok I'll work with bors/rust-central-station to get this merged.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

Ok let's see if this works...

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 15, 2020

📌 Commit 2258f60f9854b8e005bd44525b84127f4370724e has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 15, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 15, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 2258f60f9854b8e005bd44525b84127f4370724e with merge 2c53bfa555bd0a848f2759a7fabf3250f8153f31...

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r=ehuss

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 15, 2020

📌 Commit 1ceefa5 has been approved by ehuss

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 15, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 1ceefa5 with merge 1bc6e45...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2020
Switch to github actions

This commit switches our CI from Azure Pipelines to GitHub Actions. The intention here is to follow the "idiomatic" provider of CI for rust-lang, and otherwise GitHub Actions is better integrated with GitHub's UI right now too.

I'll need to tweak bors to actually `@bors: r+` this to have it successfully get merged, but I think it'd be good to get some review first.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 15, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: ehuss
Pushing 1bc6e45 to master...

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

Ok so tests passed on the merge commit, the "bors build finished" status came up green, and the commit was actually indeed pushed to the master branch.

The PR wasn't auto-closed, however. AFAIK auto-closing is a feature of GitHub, not bors, so this may just be an unlucky intermittent issue on their end?

I'll close this manually for now, but we should watch the next PR closely!

@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the gha branch July 15, 2020 15:13
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2020
Update cargo

21 commits in 43cf77395cad5b79887b20b7cf19d418bbd703a9..aa6872140ab0fa10f641ab0b981d5330d419e927
2020-07-13 17:35:42 +0000 to 2020-07-23 13:46:27 +0000
- Update features set in CI. (rust-lang/cargo#8530)
- Stabilize -Z crate-versions (rust-lang/cargo#8509)
- Fix typo in docs (rust-lang/cargo#8529)
- Remove unused CompileMode::all_modes (rust-lang/cargo#8526)
- Mask out system core.autocrlf settings before resetting git repos (rust-lang/cargo#8523)
- Flag git zlib errors as spurious errors (rust-lang/cargo#8520)
- Fix the help display for the target-triple option (rust-lang/cargo#8515)
- Check workspace member existence as dir. (rust-lang/cargo#8511)
- Bump to 0.48.0, update changelog (rust-lang/cargo#8508)
- Apply workspace.exclude to workspace.default-members. (rust-lang/cargo#8485)
- Fix nightly tests for intra-doc links. (rust-lang/cargo#8528)
- doc: Replace "regenerate" with "revoke" for API tokens (rust-lang/cargo#8510)
- Add back Manifest::targets_mut (rust-lang/cargo#8494)
- Build host dependencies with opt-level 0 by default (rust-lang/cargo#8500)
- Fix freshness checks for build scripts on renamed dirs (rust-lang/cargo#8497)
- Add a `-Zbuild-std-features` flag (rust-lang/cargo#8490)
- clippy cleanups (rust-lang/cargo#8495)
- Fix self-publish script. (rust-lang/cargo#8492)
- Ensure `unstable.build-std` works like `-Zbuild-std` (rust-lang/cargo#8491)
- Make `cargo metadata` output deterministic (rust-lang/cargo#8489)
- Switch to github actions (rust-lang/cargo#8467)
@ehuss ehuss added this to the 1.47.0 milestone Feb 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants