-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix rebuild issues with rustdoc. #9419
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Apr 27, 2021
@bors: r+ Nah this seems reasonable to me, and if the perf is off we could always try to improve it later! |
📌 Commit 44c549e has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Apr 27, 2021
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2021
Update cargo 5 commits in 0ed318d182e465cd66071b91ac3d265af63ef8a1..4369396ce7d270972955d876eaa4954bea56bcd9 2021-04-23 20:54:54 +0000 to 2021-04-27 14:35:53 +0000 - Fix rebuild issues with rustdoc. (rust-lang/cargo#9419) - Always use full metadata hash for -C metadata. (rust-lang/cargo#9418) - Expose build.target .cargo/config setting as packages.target in Cargo.toml (rust-lang/cargo#9030) - Some changes to rustdoc fingerprint checking. (rust-lang/cargo#9404) - Document that CARGO_PKG_ are availble to build.rs (rust-lang/cargo#9405)
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2021
Fix collision doc tests randomly failing. This fixes some tests that were randomly failing on CI. The cause is that #9419 added a remove_dir_all on the `doc` directory. However, if two jobs are trying to write to that directory at the same time, this can cause errors. The failure rate is low (a little over 1%), and I was unable to reproduce locally (only on GitHub's CI and only on the Windows job). The solution is to run the jobs with -j1 so they run serially. I only saw errors for `collision_doc_sources`, but to be on the safe side I added j1 to similar tests.
This was referenced May 1, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This fixes two issues related to rebuilds with rustdoc:
cargo doc
would result in Cargo not rebuilding the documentation. This is because it was keeping the fingerprints in separate directories based on the features used. However, the rustdoc output isn't keyed off the metadata hash, so although the old fingerprint seemed "up to date", in reality the documentation was rewritten and needs to be rebuilt. The solution is to use a simplified hash for the fingerprint directory name.I'm a little concerned about potential performance impact of running
remove_dir_all
, but I think it shouldn't be too bad?Fixes #7370