-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 633
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
0.3: Backports #2389
Merged
Merged
0.3: Backports #2389
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When select all is not yet finished (for example, due to timeout), underlying futures may need to be extracted to be updated to construct a fresh select all.
After rust-lang#2216, these redundant imports are unneeded. This reverts almost all of rust-lang#2101. This also includes some minor cleanup of imports in tests.
If the test is related to a particular module, use the file name starting with the module name.
Add `.editorconfig` with sensible defaults. Many editors understand editorconfig, and the most important one here is IntelliJ IDEA which does not insert file trailing newline by default, but does it out of box this provided `.editorconfig`.
Allow calling `UnboundedReceiver::try_next` and `Receiver::try_next` after `None`: do not panic. Not-panicking is equally safe, and does not have negative performance implication. It is irrelevant for `Stream` implementation to panic or not (because `Stream` behavior is unspecified after `None`), but panicking in `try_next` just complicates the interface: returned `Ok(None)` is reasonable assumption to have. Consider this use case: drain the queue on drop by performing app-specific cleanup of queued messages. The obvious implementation would be: ``` impl Drop for MyReceiverWrapper { fn drop(&mut self) { while let Ok(Some(m)) self.try_next() { cleanup(m); } } } ``` Without this change, I cannot even say for sure how this code need to be implemented to avoid panicking. E. g. is `is_closed` enough or some additional checks need to be performed?
Similar change applied to `UnboundedReceiver::try_next` a few commits ago.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backports: