Change "show hidden lines" icon to "eye" instead of "expand." #1281
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In a recent discussion in the amethyst docs discord channel, it was suggested that using an "eye" icon might make the show hidden lines feature of mdbook's code sample rendering more discoverable. I myself overlooked the arrows that are in use now. Fixes rust-lang#663 at least in part.
ehuss
approved these changes
Jul 21, 2020
Ruin0x11
pushed a commit
to Ruin0x11/mdBook
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 30, 2020
Change "show hidden lines" icon to "eye" instead of "expand."
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In a recent discussion in the amethyst docs discord channel,
it was suggested that using an "eye" icon might make the show hidden
lines feature of mdbook's code sample rendering more discoverable.
I myself overlooked the arrows that are in use now for longer than I'd like to admit.
Fixes #663 at least in part.
Some rendered output from the example book follows: