-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 348
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make cargo-miri run documentation tests #1671
Conversation
I had completely forgotten about Given this still requires a newer rustdoc, I don't expect this to pass CI though. |
Thanks a lot for this PR! I have this in my queue of things to do. Unfortunately, I am pretty busy currently and reviewing these PRs is but one of many things competing for my spare time, so it might take a week or more until I get around to taking a closer look at this. Sorry for that. |
No worries, take all the time you need! |
Has the rustdoc change landed in the rustc repository in the mean time? Can you rebase this PR over Miri master? That should now work with latest rustc. |
This has been merged for about a week now, yes. I rolled up all of your suggestions into a single commit, then rebased and force-pushed, we should be good to go. Let's see what CI has to say about it. |
I'd prefer if you could avoid squashing while we are still doing review. That makes my job much easier as it means I do not have to re-read all your code. :)
Is the version in |
Argh, sorry about that. Good thing this was mostly about adding more comments. The |
Looks like cargo by default does not run doctests in cross-mode, but an experimental feature exists to fix that: rust-lang/cargo#7040. Maybe our test suite could use that? |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #1675) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
That should do it, I think. I'll get around to merging this with #1675 later today, maybe tomorrow. Edit: Oops, forgot to save after adding a comment. |
Getting this to work locally was actually pretty easy, but the CI setup really doesn't like the Furthermore, I don't think Soo, I'll have to revise this some more, I guess. |
Not supporting cross-running of doctests at first is also fine, if it turns out to be hard (and it seems like it does^^). You can use the existing |
Sounds good to me. I should be able to finish up by tomorrow in that case :) If no one else picks this up, I should be able to set some time aside to investigate cross-running starting around mid-March (I have exams coming up until then). |
Awesome. :) Once this lands, it's probably best to create an issue and leave such notes there. And good call on not letting Miri distract you too much from your exams 👍 |
@teryror I'm sorry I lost track... is this PR waiting for me to review it, or do you have further changes planned? |
This is ready for review, yes, probably should have pinged you about that, sorry. I didn't rebase in a week or so, no changes planned besides that. |
env={'MIRIFLAGS': "-Zmiri-disable-isolation"}, | ||
) | ||
test("`cargo miri test` (raw-ptr tracking)", | ||
cargo_miri("test"), | ||
"test.default.stdout.ref", rustdoc_ref, | ||
default_ref, "test.stderr-empty.ref", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you change one of these tests to also pass --no-doc
, just to make sure that that actually has the intended effect?
This looks great, I just have some minor nits. :) |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This PR does not pass a test that will be introduced in #1709:
This can fix it (feel free to cherry-pick it, but it duplicates some |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #1710) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
@teryror I haven't heard from you in a while, so I assume you moved on to other things. Thanks a lot for this PR! I will take over and finish it so that it can hopefully land soon. :) |
Closing in favor of #1757. |
This would resolve #584.
It Works On My Machine. Specifically, it needs a version of rustdoc with this change, which was only merged yesterday, i.e. it needs the most recent nightly build. With that, I can run the entire coca test suite successfully, which is what I used for testing this feature. Verbose output and/or purposefully changing a doc-test to fail confirm this is working as intended, and not just reported incorrectly.
However, updating
rustc-version
breaks several tests from Miri's own test suite, so merging this will have to wait. Still, I'm sure this would benefit a lot from code review and testing on other projects, in other build environments.