Merge pull request #1335 from thepowersgang/fix-const-unsafe-fn-order

Edit #911 - The order `const unsafe fn` was chosen (rust-lang/rust#29107)
rust-lang · Oct 26, 2015 · 7108a93 · 7108a93
2 parents 4f7dfb0 + 5f69ff5
commit 7108a93
Showing 1 changed file with 2 additions and 2 deletions.
diff --git a/text/0911-const-fn.md b/text/0911-const-fn.md
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ invariants to be maintained (e.g. `std::ptr::Unique` requires a non-null pointer
 struct OptionalInt(u32);
 impl OptionalInt {
     /// Value must be non-zero
-    unsafe const fn new(val: u32) -> OptionalInt {
+    const unsafe fn new(val: u32) -> OptionalInt {
         OptionalInt(val)
     }
 }
@@ -241,4 +241,4 @@ cannot be taken for granted, at least `if`/`else` should eventually work.
 
 Since it was accepted, the RFC has been updated as follows:
 
-1. Allowed `unsafe const fn`
+1. Allowed `const unsafe fn`