We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I do not want to ever have to think about this, because it does not matter and is not useful:
warning: struct constructor field order is inconsistent with struct definition field order --> src/main.rs:85:12 | 85 | Ok(Self { | ____________^ 86 | | slack_authorization, 87 | | redis_connection, 88 | | expiry, 89 | | slack_client, 90 | | }) | |_________^ help: try: `Self { slack_authorization, expiry, redis_connection, slack_client }` | = note: `#[warn(clippy::inconsistent_struct_constructor)]` on by default = help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#inconsistent_struct_constructor
If this should be anywhere, it should be in rustfmt, so it can just get automatically applied and so that I don't waste my time on this.
At very most, this should be pedantic and not a warning by default.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
inconsistent_struct_constructor was moved to pedantic by #7193.
inconsistent_struct_constructor
Sorry, something went wrong.
I'm closing this because of #7248 (comment). If you have something on this, feel free to reopen this or make some comments.
No branches or pull requests
I do not want to ever have to think about this, because it does not matter and is not useful:
If this should be anywhere, it should be in rustfmt, so it can just get automatically applied and so that I don't waste my time on this.
At very most, this should be pedantic and not a warning by default.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: