Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deserialize Msrv directly in Conf #11683

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 19, 2023
Merged

Conversation

Alexendoo
Copy link
Member

Gives the error a span pointing to the invalid config value

Also puts Conf itself in the OnceLock rather than just the Msrv for the register_late_mod_pass work since it will be used from two different callbacks

changelog: none

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 18, 2023

r? @Manishearth

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Oct 18, 2023
@Manishearth
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 18, 2023

📌 Commit f36f59c has been approved by Manishearth

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 18, 2023

⌛ Testing commit f36f59c with merge 4b4ac1d...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2023
Deserialize `Msrv` directly in `Conf`

Gives the error a span pointing to the invalid config value

Also puts `Conf` itself in the `OnceLock` rather than just the `Msrv` for [the `register_late_mod_pass` work](rust-lang/rust#116731) since it will be used from two different callbacks

changelog: none
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 18, 2023

💔 Test failed - checks-action_test

@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ Suppress lints whenever the suggested change would cause breakage for other crat
## `msrv`
The minimum rust version that the project supports

**Default Value:** `None` (`Option<String>`)
**Default Value:** `Msrv { stack: [] }` (`crate::Msrv`)
Copy link
Member

@flip1995 flip1995 Oct 18, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Huh, why is the default value of MSRV an empty stack? 🤔

EDIT: Ah I see why now. But this might be confusing to the user. I'm not sure what to do about this though, so I don't want to block this PR on this. I really like the code improvements and the pointing to the value.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah damn I didn't think about that, I think we need to change that in general since other config values also show internal type names which isn't helpful for public documentation

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right, I don't think this has to be done in this PR though. So feel free to r=me here now. But if you feel like doing it in this PR, I won't stop you 🙃

@Alexendoo
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r=Manishearth,flip1995

I'll think about the config thing separately, I think it would need website changes as well

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 19, 2023

📌 Commit 1528c1d has been approved by Manishearth,flip1995

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 19, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 1528c1d with merge 9574d28...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 19, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: Manishearth,flip1995
Pushing 9574d28 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 9574d28 into rust-lang:master Oct 19, 2023
7 checks passed
@Alexendoo Alexendoo deleted the msrv-config branch October 19, 2023 12:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants