Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Downgrade unreadable_literal to pedantic #5419

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 8, 2020

Conversation

dtolnay
Copy link
Member

@dtolnay dtolnay commented Apr 4, 2020

As motivated by #5418. This is the top most commonly suppressed Clippy style lint, which indicates that the community has decided they don't share Clippy's opinion on the best style of this.

I've left the lint in as pedantic, though it could be that "restriction" would be better -- I can see this lint being useful as an opt-in restriction in some codebases.

changelog: Remove unreadable_literal from default set of enabled lints

@flip1995 flip1995 added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: The marked PR was approved and is only waiting bors label Apr 6, 2020
@flip1995
Copy link
Member

flip1995 commented Apr 7, 2020

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 7, 2020

📌 Commit be34bc4 has been approved by flip1995

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 7, 2020

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 2, this pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened

flip1995 added a commit to flip1995/rust-clippy that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2020
Downgrade unreadable_literal to pedantic

As motivated by rust-lang#5418. This is the top most commonly suppressed Clippy style lint, which indicates that the community has decided they don't share Clippy's opinion on the best style of this.

I've left the lint in as pedantic, though it could be that "restriction" would be better -- I can see this lint being useful as an opt-in restriction in some codebases.

changelog: Remove unreadable_literal from default set of enabled lints
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2020
Rollup of 12 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #5345 (Add lint for float in array comparison)
 - #5406 (Fix update_lints)
 - #5409 (Downgrade let_unit_value to pedantic)
 - #5410 (Downgrade trivially_copy_pass_by_ref to pedantic)
 - #5412 (Downgrade inefficient_to_string to pedantic)
 - #5415 (Add new lint for `Result<T, E>.map_or(None, Some(T))`)
 - #5417 (Update doc links and mentioned names in docs)
 - #5419 (Downgrade unreadable_literal to pedantic)
 - #5420 (Downgrade new_ret_no_self to pedantic)
 - #5422 (CONTRIBUTING.md: fix broken triage link)
 - #5424 (Incorrect suspicious_op_assign_impl)
 - #5425 (Ehance opt_as_ref_deref lint.)

Failed merges:

 - #5411 (Downgrade implicit_hasher to pedantic)
 - #5428 (Move cognitive_complexity to nursery)

r? @ghost

changelog: rollup
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2020
Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #5406 (Fix update_lints)
 - #5409 (Downgrade let_unit_value to pedantic)
 - #5410 (Downgrade trivially_copy_pass_by_ref to pedantic)
 - #5412 (Downgrade inefficient_to_string to pedantic)
 - #5415 (Add new lint for `Result<T, E>.map_or(None, Some(T))`)
 - #5417 (Update doc links and mentioned names in docs)
 - #5419 (Downgrade unreadable_literal to pedantic)
 - #5420 (Downgrade new_ret_no_self to pedantic)
 - #5422 (CONTRIBUTING.md: fix broken triage link)
 - #5424 (Incorrect suspicious_op_assign_impl)
 - #5425 (Ehance opt_as_ref_deref lint.)

Failed merges:

 - #5345 (Add lint for float in array comparison)
 - #5411 (Downgrade implicit_hasher to pedantic)
 - #5428 (Move cognitive_complexity to nursery)

r? @ghost

changelog: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 2011d9a into rust-lang:master Apr 8, 2020
@dtolnay dtolnay deleted the unreadable branch April 8, 2020 17:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: The marked PR was approved and is only waiting bors
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants