Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improve advice in iter_nth_zero #5793

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 14, 2020
Merged

Conversation

warner
Copy link
Contributor

@warner warner commented Jul 13, 2020

fixes #5783

Please keep the line below
changelog: For iter_nth_zero, the "use .next()" replacement advice is on the last line of the code snippet, where it is vulnerable to truncation. Display that advice at the beginning instead.

The "use .next()" replacement advice is on the last line of the code snippet,
where it is vulnerable to truncation. Display that advice at the beginning
instead.

closes rust-lang#5783
@rust-highfive
Copy link

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @phansch (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Jul 13, 2020
"called `.nth(0)` on a `std::iter::Iterator`",
"try calling",
"called `.nth(0)` on a `std::iter::Iterator`, when `.next()` is equivalent",
"try calling .next() instead of .nth(0)",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NIT:

Suggested change
"try calling .next() instead of .nth(0)",
"try calling `.next()` instead of `.nth(0)`",

(remember to also update the stderr files after this change)

@flip1995
Copy link
Member

r? @flip1995

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned flip1995 and unassigned phansch Jul 14, 2020
@flip1995 flip1995 added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action from the author. (Use `@rustbot ready` to update this status) and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties labels Jul 14, 2020
@flip1995
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 14, 2020

📌 Commit e83b3eb has been approved by flip1995

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 14, 2020

⌛ Testing commit e83b3eb with merge 128c5de...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 14, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: flip1995
Pushing 128c5de to master...

@bors bors merged commit 128c5de into rust-lang:master Jul 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action from the author. (Use `@rustbot ready` to update this status)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

iter_nth_zero lint didn't display 'next' in recommendation
5 participants