Auto merge of #121394 - oli-obk:define_opaque_types, r=compiler-errors

some smaller DefiningOpaqueTypes::No -> Yes switches

r? `@compiler-errors`

These are some easy cases, so let's get them out of the way first.
I added tests exercising the specialization code paths that I believe weren't tested so far.

follow-up to #117348

compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/callee.rs

@@ -918,7 +918,8 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
 
         let param = callee_args.const_at(host_effect_index);
         let cause = self.misc(span);
-        match self.at(&cause, self.param_env).eq(infer::DefineOpaqueTypes::No, effect, param) {
+        // We know the type of `effect` to be `bool`, there will be no opaque type inference.
+        match self.at(&cause, self.param_env).eq(infer::DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, effect, param) {
             Ok(infer::InferOk { obligations, value: () }) => {
                 self.register_predicates(obligations);
             }

compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/demand.rs

@@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
                     // what our ideal rcvr ty would look like.
                     let _ = self
                         .at(&ObligationCause::dummy(), self.param_env)
-                        .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, method.sig.inputs()[idx + 1], arg_ty)
+                        .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, method.sig.inputs()[idx + 1], arg_ty)
                         .ok()?;
                     self.select_obligations_where_possible(|errs| {
                         // Yeet the errors, we're already reporting errors.
@@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
                     .and_then(|method| {
                         let _ = self
                             .at(&ObligationCause::dummy(), self.param_env)
-                            .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, ideal_rcvr_ty, expected_ty)
+                            .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, ideal_rcvr_ty, expected_ty)
                             .ok()?;
                         Some(method)
                     });

compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/expr.rs

@@ -44,10 +44,7 @@ use rustc_infer::infer::InferOk;
 use rustc_infer::traits::query::NoSolution;
 use rustc_infer::traits::ObligationCause;
 use rustc_middle::ty::adjustment::{Adjust, Adjustment, AllowTwoPhase};
-use rustc_middle::ty::error::{
-    ExpectedFound,
-    TypeError::{FieldMisMatch, Sorts},
-};
+use rustc_middle::ty::error::{ExpectedFound, TypeError::Sorts};
 use rustc_middle::ty::GenericArgsRef;
 use rustc_middle::ty::{self, AdtKind, Ty, TypeVisitableExt};
 use rustc_session::errors::ExprParenthesesNeeded;
@@ -1811,24 +1808,23 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
                                 let target_ty = self.field_ty(base_expr.span, f, args);
                                 let cause = self.misc(base_expr.span);
                                 match self.at(&cause, self.param_env).sup(
-                                    DefineOpaqueTypes::No,
+                                    // We're already using inference variables for any params, and don't allow converting
+                                    // between different structs, so there is no way this ever actually defines an opaque type.
+                                    // Thus choosing `Yes` is fine.
+                                    DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes,
                                     target_ty,
                                     fru_ty,
                                 ) {
                                     Ok(InferOk { obligations, value: () }) => {
                                         self.register_predicates(obligations)
                                     }
                                     Err(_) => {
-                                        // This should never happen, since we're just subtyping the
-                                        // remaining_fields, but it's fine to emit this, I guess.
-                                        self.err_ctxt()
-                                            .report_mismatched_types(
-                                                &cause,
-                                                target_ty,
-                                                fru_ty,
-                                                FieldMisMatch(variant.name, ident.name),
-                                            )
-                                            .emit();
+                                        span_bug!(
+                                            cause.span(),
+                                            "subtyping remaining fields of type changing FRU failed: {target_ty} != {fru_ty}: {}::{}",
+                                            variant.name,
+                                            ident.name,
+                                        );
                                     }
                                 }
                             }

compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/fn_ctxt/checks.rs

@@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
             // Using probe here, since we don't want this subtyping to affect inference.
             let subtyping_error = self.probe(|_| {
                 self.at(&self.misc(arg_span), self.param_env)
-                    .sup(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, formal_input_ty, coerced_ty)
+                    .sup(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, formal_input_ty, coerced_ty)
                     .err()
             });
 

compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/mod.rs

@@ -843,7 +843,9 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
     {
         let origin = &ObligationCause::dummy();
         self.probe(|_| {
-            self.at(origin, param_env).sub(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, expected, actual).is_ok()
+            // We're only answering whether there could be a subtyping relation, and with
+            // opaque types, "there could be one", via registering a hidden type.
+            self.at(origin, param_env).sub(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, expected, actual).is_ok()
         })
     }
 
@@ -852,7 +854,9 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
         T: at::ToTrace<'tcx>,
     {
         let origin = &ObligationCause::dummy();
-        self.probe(|_| self.at(origin, param_env).eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, a, b).is_ok())
+        // We're only answering whether the types could be the same, and with
+        // opaque types, "they can be the same", via registering a hidden type.
+        self.probe(|_| self.at(origin, param_env).eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, a, b).is_ok())
     }
 
     #[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")]

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/eval_ctxt/mod.rs

@@ -720,7 +720,8 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
     ) -> Result<(), NoSolution> {
         self.infcx
             .at(&ObligationCause::dummy(), param_env)
-            .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, lhs, rhs)
+            // New solver ignores DefineOpaqueTypes, so choose Yes for consistency
+            .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, lhs, rhs)
             .map(|InferOk { value: (), obligations }| {
                 self.add_goals(GoalSource::Misc, obligations.into_iter().map(|o| o.into()));
             })
@@ -759,7 +760,8 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
     ) -> Result<(), NoSolution> {
         self.infcx
             .at(&ObligationCause::dummy(), param_env)
-            .sub(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, sub, sup)
+            // New solver ignores DefineOpaqueTypes, so choose Yes for consistency
+            .sub(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, sub, sup)
             .map(|InferOk { value: (), obligations }| {
                 self.add_goals(GoalSource::Misc, obligations.into_iter().map(|o| o.into()));
             })
@@ -779,7 +781,8 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
     ) -> Result<(), NoSolution> {
         self.infcx
             .at(&ObligationCause::dummy(), param_env)
-            .relate(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, lhs, variance, rhs)
+            // New solver ignores DefineOpaqueTypes, so choose Yes for consistency
+            .relate(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, lhs, variance, rhs)
             .map(|InferOk { value: (), obligations }| {
                 self.add_goals(GoalSource::Misc, obligations.into_iter().map(|o| o.into()));
             })
@@ -803,7 +806,8 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
     ) -> Result<Vec<Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>>, NoSolution> {
         self.infcx
             .at(&ObligationCause::dummy(), param_env)
-            .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, lhs, rhs)
+            // New solver ignores DefineOpaqueTypes, so choose Yes for consistency
+            .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, lhs, rhs)
             .map(|InferOk { value: (), obligations }| {
                 obligations.into_iter().map(|o| o.into()).collect()
             })

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/eval_ctxt/select.rs

@@ -182,7 +182,8 @@ fn rematch_impl<'tcx>(
 
     let mut nested = infcx
         .at(&ObligationCause::dummy(), goal.param_env)
-        .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, goal.predicate.trait_ref, impl_trait_ref)
+        // New solver ignores DefineOpaqueTypes, so choose Yes for consistency
+        .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, goal.predicate.trait_ref, impl_trait_ref)
         .map_err(|_| SelectionError::Unimplemented)?
         .into_obligations();
 
@@ -257,7 +258,8 @@ fn rematch_unsize<'tcx>(
             nested.extend(
                 infcx
                     .at(&ObligationCause::dummy(), goal.param_env)
-                    .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, a_elem_ty, b_elem_ty)
+                    // New solver ignores DefineOpaqueTypes, so choose Yes for consistency
+                    .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, a_elem_ty, b_elem_ty)
                     .expect("expected rematch to succeed")
                     .into_obligations(),
             );
@@ -300,7 +302,8 @@ fn rematch_unsize<'tcx>(
             nested.extend(
                 infcx
                     .at(&ObligationCause::dummy(), goal.param_env)
-                    .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, unsized_a_ty, b_ty)
+                    // New solver ignores DefineOpaqueTypes, so choose Yes for consistency
+                    .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, unsized_a_ty, b_ty)
                     .expect("expected rematch to succeed")
                     .into_obligations(),
             );
@@ -329,7 +332,8 @@ fn rematch_unsize<'tcx>(
             nested.extend(
                 infcx
                     .at(&ObligationCause::dummy(), goal.param_env)
-                    .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, unsized_a_ty, b_ty)
+                    // New solver ignores DefineOpaqueTypes, so choose Yes for consistency
+                    .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, unsized_a_ty, b_ty)
                     .expect("expected rematch to succeed")
                     .into_obligations(),
             );

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/coherence.rs

@@ -477,7 +477,8 @@ fn plug_infer_with_placeholders<'tcx>(
             if ty.is_ty_var() {
                 let Ok(InferOk { value: (), obligations }) =
                     self.infcx.at(&ObligationCause::dummy(), ty::ParamEnv::empty()).eq(
-                        DefineOpaqueTypes::No,
+                        // Comparing against a type variable never registers hidden types anyway
+                        DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes,
                         ty,
                         Ty::new_placeholder(
                             self.infcx.tcx,
@@ -504,7 +505,9 @@ fn plug_infer_with_placeholders<'tcx>(
             if ct.is_ct_infer() {
                 let Ok(InferOk { value: (), obligations }) =
                     self.infcx.at(&ObligationCause::dummy(), ty::ParamEnv::empty()).eq(
-                        DefineOpaqueTypes::No,
+                        // The types of the constants are the same, so there is no hidden type
+                        // registration happening anyway.
+                        DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes,
                         ct,
                         ty::Const::new_placeholder(
                             self.infcx.tcx,
@@ -532,7 +535,8 @@ fn plug_infer_with_placeholders<'tcx>(
                 if r.is_var() {
                     let Ok(InferOk { value: (), obligations }) =
                         self.infcx.at(&ObligationCause::dummy(), ty::ParamEnv::empty()).eq(
-                            DefineOpaqueTypes::No,
+                            // Lifetimes don't contain opaque types (or any types for that matter).
+                            DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes,
                             r,
                             ty::Region::new_placeholder(
                                 self.infcx.tcx,

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/error_reporting/suggestions.rs

@@ -3842,7 +3842,9 @@ impl<'tcx> TypeErrCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
                             self.probe(|_| {
                                 match self
                                     .at(&ObligationCause::misc(expr.span, body_id), param_env)
-                                    .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, expected, actual)
+                                    // Doesn't actually matter if we define opaque types here, this is just used for
+                                    // diagnostics, and the result is never kept around.
+                                    .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, expected, actual)
                                 {
                                     Ok(_) => (), // We ignore nested obligations here for now.
                                     Err(err) => type_diffs.push(err),

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/fulfill.rs

@@ -429,7 +429,8 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ObligationProcessor for FulfillProcessor<'a, 'tcx> {
                 // as the cause of an overflow.
                 ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::ConstArgHasType(ct, ty)) => {
                     match self.selcx.infcx.at(&obligation.cause, obligation.param_env).eq(
-                        DefineOpaqueTypes::No,
+                        // Only really excercised by generic_const_exprs
+                        DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes,
                         ct.ty(),
                         ty,
                     ) {
@@ -571,7 +572,9 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ObligationProcessor for FulfillProcessor<'a, 'tcx> {
                                 if let Ok(new_obligations) = infcx
                                     .at(&obligation.cause, obligation.param_env)
                                     .trace(c1, c2)
-                                    .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, a.args, b.args)
+                                    // Can define opaque types as this is only reachable with
+                                    // `generic_const_exprs`
+                                    .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, a.args, b.args)
                                 {
                                     return ProcessResult::Changed(mk_pending(
                                         new_obligations.into_obligations(),
@@ -582,7 +585,9 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ObligationProcessor for FulfillProcessor<'a, 'tcx> {
                             (_, _) => {
                                 if let Ok(new_obligations) = infcx
                                     .at(&obligation.cause, obligation.param_env)
-                                    .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, c1, c2)
+                                    // Can define opaque types as this is only reachable with
+                                    // `generic_const_exprs`
+                                    .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, c1, c2)
                                 {
                                     return ProcessResult::Changed(mk_pending(
                                         new_obligations.into_obligations(),
@@ -623,7 +628,9 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ObligationProcessor for FulfillProcessor<'a, 'tcx> {
                     match (evaluate(c1), evaluate(c2)) {
                         (Ok(c1), Ok(c2)) => {
                             match self.selcx.infcx.at(&obligation.cause, obligation.param_env).eq(
-                                DefineOpaqueTypes::No,
+                                // Can define opaque types as this is only reachable with
+                                // `generic_const_exprs`
+                                DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes,
                                 c1,
                                 c2,
                             ) {

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/mod.rs

@@ -906,7 +906,9 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
                                     .infcx
                                     .at(&obligation.cause, obligation.param_env)
                                     .trace(c1, c2)
-                                    .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, a.args, b.args)
+                                    // Can define opaque types as this is only reachable with
+                                    // `generic_const_exprs`
+                                    .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, a.args, b.args)
                                 {
                                     return self.evaluate_predicates_recursively(
                                         previous_stack,
@@ -919,7 +921,9 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
                                 if let Ok(InferOk { obligations, value: () }) = self
                                     .infcx
                                     .at(&obligation.cause, obligation.param_env)
-                                    .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, c1, c2)
+                                    // Can define opaque types as this is only reachable with
+                                    // `generic_const_exprs`
+                                    .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, c1, c2)
                                 {
                                     return self.evaluate_predicates_recursively(
                                         previous_stack,
@@ -949,7 +953,9 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
                     match (evaluate(c1), evaluate(c2)) {
                         (Ok(c1), Ok(c2)) => {
                             match self.infcx.at(&obligation.cause, obligation.param_env).eq(
-                                DefineOpaqueTypes::No,
+                                // Can define opaque types as this is only reachable with
+                                // `generic_const_exprs`
+                                DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes,
                                 c1,
                                 c2,
                             ) {
@@ -982,7 +988,8 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
                 ty::PredicateKind::Ambiguous => Ok(EvaluatedToAmbig),
                 ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::ConstArgHasType(ct, ty)) => {
                     match self.infcx.at(&obligation.cause, obligation.param_env).eq(
-                        DefineOpaqueTypes::No,
+                        // Only really excercised by generic_const_exprs
+                        DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes,
                         ct.ty(),
                         ty,
                     ) {

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/specialize/mod.rs

@@ -247,7 +247,12 @@ fn fulfill_implication<'tcx>(
     // do the impls unify? If not, no specialization.
     let Ok(InferOk { obligations: more_obligations, .. }) = infcx
         .at(&ObligationCause::dummy(), param_env)
-        .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, source_trait, target_trait)
+        // Ok to use `Yes`, as all the generic params are already replaced by inference variables,
+        // which will match the opaque type no matter if it is defining or not.
+        // Any concrete type that would match the opaque would already be handled by coherence rules,
+        // and thus either be ok to match here and already have errored, or it won't match, in which
+        // case there is no issue anyway.
+        .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, source_trait, target_trait)
     else {
         debug!("fulfill_implication: {:?} does not unify with {:?}", source_trait, target_trait);
         return Err(());

src/librustdoc/clean/blanket_impl.rs

@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> BlanketImplFinder<'a, 'tcx> {
                 // Require the type the impl is implemented on to match
                 // our type, and ignore the impl if there was a mismatch.
                 let Ok(eq_result) = infcx.at(&traits::ObligationCause::dummy(), param_env).eq(
-                    DefineOpaqueTypes::No,
+                    DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes,
                     impl_trait_ref.self_ty(),
                     impl_ty,
                 ) else {

tests/ui/const-generics/generic_const_exprs/opaque_type.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+#![feature(generic_const_exprs, type_alias_impl_trait)]
+#![allow(incomplete_features)]
+
+type Foo = impl Sized;
+
+fn with_bound<const N: usize>() -> Foo
+where
+    [u8; (N / 2) as usize]: Sized,
+{
+    let _: [u8; (N / 2) as Foo] = [0; (N / 2) as usize];
+    //~^ ERROR mismatched types
+    //~| ERROR non-primitive cast: `usize` as `Foo`
+    todo!()
+}
+
+fn main() {
+    with_bound::<4>();
+}