-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
transmute
calculates incorrect size of some generic types involving pointers to T: ?Sized
.
#101084
Labels
C-bug
Category: This is a bug.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-opsem
Relevant to the opsem team
Comments
zachs18
changed the title
Aug 27, 2022
transmute
does not correctly calculate size of some types.transmute
does not correctly calculate size of some generic types involving pointers to T: ?Sized
.
zachs18
changed the title
Aug 28, 2022
transmute
does not correctly calculate size of some generic types involving pointers to T: ?Sized
.transmute
calculates incorrect size of some generic types involving pointers to T: ?Sized
.
fmease
added
A-lint
Area: Lints (warnings about flaws in source code) such as unused_mut.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-opsem
Relevant to the opsem team
and removed
needs-triage-legacy
A-lint
Area: Lints (warnings about flaws in source code) such as unused_mut.
labels
Jan 26, 2024
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jun 24, 2024
…li-obk transmute size check: properly account for alignment Fixes another place where ZST alignment was ignored when checking whether something is a newtype. I wonder how many more of these there are... Fixes rust-lang#101084
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jun 24, 2024
…li-obk transmute size check: properly account for alignment Fixes another place where ZST alignment was ignored when checking whether something is a newtype. I wonder how many more of these there are... Fixes rust-lang#101084
tiif
pushed a commit
to tiif/miri
that referenced
this issue
Jun 25, 2024
transmute size check: properly account for alignment Fixes another place where ZST alignment was ignored when checking whether something is a newtype. I wonder how many more of these there are... Fixes rust-lang/rust#101084
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust-clippy
that referenced
this issue
Jun 28, 2024
transmute size check: properly account for alignment Fixes another place where ZST alignment was ignored when checking whether something is a newtype. I wonder how many more of these there are... Fixes rust-lang/rust#101084
lnicola
pushed a commit
to lnicola/rust-analyzer
that referenced
this issue
Jul 11, 2024
transmute size check: properly account for alignment Fixes another place where ZST alignment was ignored when checking whether something is a newtype. I wonder how many more of these there are... Fixes rust-lang/rust#101084
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
C-bug
Category: This is a bug.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-opsem
Relevant to the opsem team
I tried this code: playground link
I expected to see this happen: Compiler error because
*mut T
andPtrAndOverAlignZST<T>
are not (known to be) the same size.Instead, this happened: The above code compiles (and runs), but ICEs miri.
Meta
rustc --version --verbose
:rustc +nightly --version --verbose
:Backtrace
No backtrace for `rustc`, since no error occurs.
AFICT, rustc currently only supports transmuting a subset of Sized types that it conservatively can guarantee are the same size. For generic struct types with ?Sized parameters, I think rustc can only guarantee the size if the whole struct's size does not depend on the parameters, or if the struct's only non-zst field is a (transitive transparent wrapper of a) pointer type depending on a generic parameter (
rustc_middle::ty::layout::SizeSkeleton
only hasKnown(usize)
andPointer { .. }
variants, so can only express completely known and only-a-pointer sizes). I think this size-calculation ignoring all ZSTs (not just 1-ZSTs) when there is a pointer field can cause transmute to (incorrectly?) allow transmuting between differently-sized types.rustc_middle::ty::layout::SizeSkeleton
probably needs to be made aware of alignment, and then needs to changecompute
to account for alignment when checking fields.See also: #101081
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: