-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rustdoc: Failed to parse rust code block with ## in 2024 #136899
Labels
A-edition-2024
Area: The 2024 edition
C-bug
Category: This is a bug.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Comments
So, an "isolated" The sequence |
Checking what's wrong. |
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this issue
Feb 12, 2025
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this issue
Feb 12, 2025
I opened #136927 to fix it. |
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this issue
Feb 12, 2025
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this issue
Feb 12, 2025
jhpratt
added a commit
to jhpratt/rust
that referenced
this issue
Feb 13, 2025
…-escape, r=notriddle Correctly escape hashtags when running `invalid_rust_codeblocks` lint Fixes rust-lang#136899. We forgot to use `map_line` when we wrote this lint. r? `@notriddle`
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this issue
Feb 13, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#136927 - GuillaumeGomez:add-missing-hashtag-escape, r=notriddle Correctly escape hashtags when running `invalid_rust_codeblocks` lint Fixes rust-lang#136899. We forgot to use `map_line` when we wrote this lint. r? ``@notriddle``
ehuss
added a commit
to ehuss/rust
that referenced
this issue
Feb 13, 2025
A small workaround for rust-lang#136899, rustdoc's invalid_rust_codeblocks was not handling this well in 2024. This may be needed when migrating to 2024 when building with stage0.
ehuss
added a commit
to ehuss/rust
that referenced
this issue
Feb 13, 2025
A small workaround for rust-lang#136899, rustdoc's invalid_rust_codeblocks was not handling this well in 2024. This may be needed when migrating to 2024 when building with stage0.
ehuss
added a commit
to ehuss/rust
that referenced
this issue
Feb 13, 2025
A small workaround for rust-lang#136899, rustdoc's invalid_rust_codeblocks was not handling this well in 2024. This may be needed when migrating to 2024 when building with stage0.
Shourya742
pushed a commit
to Shourya742/rust
that referenced
this issue
Feb 15, 2025
A small workaround for rust-lang#136899, rustdoc's invalid_rust_codeblocks was not handling this well in 2024. This may be needed when migrating to 2024 when building with stage0.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-edition-2024
Area: The 2024 edition
C-bug
Category: This is a bug.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
In 2024, rustdoc seems to fail to parse a rust code line that starts with
##
.In 2021, this renders in a weird way where it strips the first
#
, but doesn't actually hide the line. I would expect the line to be hidden. I don't know if that is intentional.In 2024,
cargo doc
generates a warning:I'm not sure what I expect here. I assume it is conflicting with the reserved syntax of 2024.
Is the
##
form really intended to be supported as a way to hide a line? cc @GuillaumeGomezMeta
rustc --version --verbose
:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: