Tracking issue for RFC 2397, "#[do_not_recommend]" #51992
Labels
A-diagnostics
Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints
A-trait-system
Area: Trait system
B-RFC-approved
Blocker: Approved by a merged RFC but not yet implemented.
C-tracking-issue
Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC
S-tracking-unimplemented
Status: The feature has not been implemented.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-lang
Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
WG-diagnostics
Working group: Diagnostics
Comments
Centril
added
A-diagnostics
cramertj
added
the
T-compiler
|
Minor question. Presuming we implement this, and later change diagnostics in ways that make this attribute unnecessary/harmful, what would the plan of action be then? Does this attribute essentially encode some particular format of these specific errors? |
|
@nagisa in that hypothetical situation, deprecate the attribute perhaps? |
4 tasks
joshtriplett
added
the
S-tracking-unimplemented
|
This came up in T-lang's backlog bonanza today. With no progress on this for years, it's not clear to us that this is still the right way forward here. @estebank, do you have any thoughts on this one? Perhaps it would be better rolled into the idea you brought up in https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/stable-diagnostic-affecting-attribute-with-unstable-api/16368?u=scottmcm? |
jackh726
added
WG-diagnostics
JohnTitor
pushed a commit
to JohnTitor/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jan 11, 2023
[RFC 2397] Initial implementation cc rust-lang#51992 Because of previous experiences where ppl didn't have the time to review large PRs (or any at all), the implementation of this feature will be delivered in small chunks to hopefully make things faster. In this initial PR, only the attribute is being declared and gated with ordinary tests.
JohnTitor
pushed a commit
to JohnTitor/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jan 13, 2023
[RFC 2397] Deny incorrect locations cc rust-lang#51992 As declared in the RFC, `#[do_not_recommend]` should only be applicable on trait implementations.
|
@rustbot claim |
|
If the proposal for |
|
@estebank It should be fine to implement this as unstable feature without waiting for the |
|
@weiznich that's my understanding too. |
|
Now that #119888 is merged, what's the next step forward for this? |
|
This feature had to be temporarily paused due to concerns around possible refactors and the new solver. https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/.E2.9C.94.20RFC-2397 If @lcnr thinks that the new solver is in a good state, then I can resume my activities with or without the |
|
Sorry for taking so long to reply to this issue. The solver is not yet in a good enough state to support work on that attribute. However, looking at the old solver again, we already track where nested obligations come from: rust/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/mod.rs Lines 2755 to 2783 in 8d490e3 This info could be used to implement it in the old solver without requiring any additional tracking: if the cause of an It will take at least another few months until the "proof tree visitor" in the new solver is at a state where it can be used for diagnostics. Right now we still have to change that code to fix the happy path behavior and I don't want to slow down progress on this by having to migrate diagnostics code each time we do so. |
|
Thank you @lcnr |
compiler-errors
added a commit
to compiler-errors/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jun 4, 2024
…diganostic_namespace, r=compiler-errors Refactor `#[diagnostic::do_not_recommend]` support This commit refactors the `#[do_not_recommend]` support in the old parser to also apply to projection errors and not only to selection errors. This allows the attribute to be used more widely. Part of rust-lang#51992 r? `@compiler-errors` <!-- If this PR is related to an unstable feature or an otherwise tracked effort, please link to the relevant tracking issue here. If you don't know of a related tracking issue or there are none, feel free to ignore this. This PR will get automatically assigned to a reviewer. In case you would like a specific user to review your work, you can assign it to them by using r? <reviewer name> -->
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jun 4, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#125717 - weiznich:move/do_not_recommend_to_diganostic_namespace, r=compiler-errors Refactor `#[diagnostic::do_not_recommend]` support This commit refactors the `#[do_not_recommend]` support in the old parser to also apply to projection errors and not only to selection errors. This allows the attribute to be used more widely. Part of rust-lang#51992 r? `@compiler-errors` <!-- If this PR is related to an unstable feature or an otherwise tracked effort, please link to the relevant tracking issue here. If you don't know of a related tracking issue or there are none, feel free to ignore this. This PR will get automatically assigned to a reviewer. In case you would like a specific user to review your work, you can assign it to them by using r? <reviewer name> -->
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jul 11, 2024
…nd_also_skips_help, r=compiler-errors
Allows `#[diagnostic::do_not_recommend]` to supress trait impls in suggestions as well
This commit changes the error reporting mechanism for not implemented traits to skip impl marked as `#[diagnostic::do_not_recommend]` in the help part of the error message ("the following other types implement trait `Foo`:"). The main use case here is to allow crate authors to skip non-meaningful confusing suggestions. A common example for this are fully generic impls on tuples.
Related to rust-lang#51992
r? `@compiler-errors`
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jul 12, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#127598 - weiznich:diagnostic_do_not_recommend_also_skips_help, r=compiler-errors Allows `#[diagnostic::do_not_recommend]` to supress trait impls in suggestions as well This commit changes the error reporting mechanism for not implemented traits to skip impl marked as `#[diagnostic::do_not_recommend]` in the help part of the error message ("the following other types implement trait `Foo`:"). The main use case here is to allow crate authors to skip non-meaningful confusing suggestions. A common example for this are fully generic impls on tuples. Related to rust-lang#51992 r? `@compiler-errors`
3 tasks
85 tasks
weiznich
added a commit
to weiznich/rust
that referenced
this issue
Oct 23, 2024
This commit seeks to stabilize the `#[diagnostic::do_not_recommend]` attribute. This attribute was first proposed as `#[do_not_recommend`] attribute in RFC 2397 (rust-lang/rfcs#2397). It gives the crate authors the ability to not suggest to the compiler to not show certain traits in it's error messages. With the presence of the `#[diagnostic]` tool attribute namespace it was decided to move the attribute there, as that lowers the amount of guarantees the compiler needs to give about the exact way this influences error messages. It turns the attribute into a hint which can be ignored. In addition to the original proposed functionality this attribute now also hides the marked trait in help messages ("This trait is implemented by: "). The attribute does not accept any argument and can only be placed on trait implementations. If it is placed somewhere else a lint warning is emitted and the attribute is otherwise ignored. If an argument is detected a lint warning is emitted and the argument is ignored. This follows the rules outlined by the diagnostic namespace. This attribute allows crates like diesel to improve their error messages drastically. The most common example here is the following error message: ``` error[E0277]: the trait bound `&str: Expression` is not satisfied --> /home/weiznich/Documents/rust/rust/tests/ui/diagnostic_namespace/do_not_recommend.rs:53:15 | LL | SelectInt.check("bar"); | ^^^^^ the trait `Expression` is not implemented for `&str`, which is required by `&str: AsExpression<Integer>` | = help: the following other types implement trait `Expression`: Bound<T> SelectInt note: required for `&str` to implement `AsExpression<Integer>` --> /home/weiznich/Documents/rust/rust/tests/ui/diagnostic_namespace/do_not_recommend.rs:26:13 | LL | impl<T, ST> AsExpression<ST> for T | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ LL | where LL | T: Expression<SqlType = ST>, | ------------------------ unsatisfied trait bound introduced here ``` By applying the new attribute to the wild card trait implementation of `AsExpression` for `T: Expression` the error message becomes: ``` error[E0277]: the trait bound `&str: AsExpression<Integer>` is not satisfied --> $DIR/as_expression.rs:55:15 | LL | SelectInt.check("bar"); | ^^^^^ the trait `AsExpression<Integer>` is not implemented for `&str` | = help: the trait `AsExpression<Text>` is implemented for `&str` = help: for that trait implementation, expected `Text`, found `Integer` ``` which makes it much easier for users to understand that they are facing a type mismatch. Other explored example usages included * This standard library error message: rust-lang#128008 * That bevy derived example: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/e1f306899514ea80abc1d1c9f6a57762afb304a3/tests/ui/diagnostic_namespace/do_not_recommend/supress_suggestions_in_help.rs (No more tuple pyramids) Fixes rust-lang#51992
weiznich
added a commit
to weiznich/rust
that referenced
this issue
Oct 23, 2024
This commit seeks to stabilize the `#[diagnostic::do_not_recommend]` attribute. This attribute was first proposed as `#[do_not_recommend`] attribute in RFC 2397 (rust-lang/rfcs#2397). It gives the crate authors the ability to not suggest to the compiler to not show certain traits in it's error messages. With the presence of the `#[diagnostic]` tool attribute namespace it was decided to move the attribute there, as that lowers the amount of guarantees the compiler needs to give about the exact way this influences error messages. It turns the attribute into a hint which can be ignored. In addition to the original proposed functionality this attribute now also hides the marked trait in help messages ("This trait is implemented by: "). The attribute does not accept any argument and can only be placed on trait implementations. If it is placed somewhere else a lint warning is emitted and the attribute is otherwise ignored. If an argument is detected a lint warning is emitted and the argument is ignored. This follows the rules outlined by the diagnostic namespace. This attribute allows crates like diesel to improve their error messages drastically. The most common example here is the following error message: ``` error[E0277]: the trait bound `&str: Expression` is not satisfied --> /home/weiznich/Documents/rust/rust/tests/ui/diagnostic_namespace/do_not_recommend.rs:53:15 | LL | SelectInt.check("bar"); | ^^^^^ the trait `Expression` is not implemented for `&str`, which is required by `&str: AsExpression<Integer>` | = help: the following other types implement trait `Expression`: Bound<T> SelectInt note: required for `&str` to implement `AsExpression<Integer>` --> /home/weiznich/Documents/rust/rust/tests/ui/diagnostic_namespace/do_not_recommend.rs:26:13 | LL | impl<T, ST> AsExpression<ST> for T | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ LL | where LL | T: Expression<SqlType = ST>, | ------------------------ unsatisfied trait bound introduced here ``` By applying the new attribute to the wild card trait implementation of `AsExpression` for `T: Expression` the error message becomes: ``` error[E0277]: the trait bound `&str: AsExpression<Integer>` is not satisfied --> $DIR/as_expression.rs:55:15 | LL | SelectInt.check("bar"); | ^^^^^ the trait `AsExpression<Integer>` is not implemented for `&str` | = help: the trait `AsExpression<Text>` is implemented for `&str` = help: for that trait implementation, expected `Text`, found `Integer` ``` which makes it much easier for users to understand that they are facing a type mismatch. Other explored example usages included * This standard library error message: rust-lang#128008 * That bevy derived example: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/e1f306899514ea80abc1d1c9f6a57762afb304a3/tests/ui/diagnostic_namespace/do_not_recommend/supress_suggestions_in_help.rs (No more tuple pyramids) Fixes rust-lang#51992
weiznich
added a commit
to weiznich/rust
that referenced
this issue
Oct 24, 2024
This commit seeks to stabilize the `#[diagnostic::do_not_recommend]` attribute. This attribute was first proposed as `#[do_not_recommend`] attribute in RFC 2397 (rust-lang/rfcs#2397). It gives the crate authors the ability to not suggest to the compiler to not show certain traits in it's error messages. With the presence of the `#[diagnostic]` tool attribute namespace it was decided to move the attribute there, as that lowers the amount of guarantees the compiler needs to give about the exact way this influences error messages. It turns the attribute into a hint which can be ignored. In addition to the original proposed functionality this attribute now also hides the marked trait in help messages ("This trait is implemented by: "). The attribute does not accept any argument and can only be placed on trait implementations. If it is placed somewhere else a lint warning is emitted and the attribute is otherwise ignored. If an argument is detected a lint warning is emitted and the argument is ignored. This follows the rules outlined by the diagnostic namespace. This attribute allows crates like diesel to improve their error messages drastically. The most common example here is the following error message: ``` error[E0277]: the trait bound `&str: Expression` is not satisfied --> /home/weiznich/Documents/rust/rust/tests/ui/diagnostic_namespace/do_not_recommend.rs:53:15 | LL | SelectInt.check("bar"); | ^^^^^ the trait `Expression` is not implemented for `&str`, which is required by `&str: AsExpression<Integer>` | = help: the following other types implement trait `Expression`: Bound<T> SelectInt note: required for `&str` to implement `AsExpression<Integer>` --> /home/weiznich/Documents/rust/rust/tests/ui/diagnostic_namespace/do_not_recommend.rs:26:13 | LL | impl<T, ST> AsExpression<ST> for T | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ LL | where LL | T: Expression<SqlType = ST>, | ------------------------ unsatisfied trait bound introduced here ``` By applying the new attribute to the wild card trait implementation of `AsExpression` for `T: Expression` the error message becomes: ``` error[E0277]: the trait bound `&str: AsExpression<Integer>` is not satisfied --> $DIR/as_expression.rs:55:15 | LL | SelectInt.check("bar"); | ^^^^^ the trait `AsExpression<Integer>` is not implemented for `&str` | = help: the trait `AsExpression<Text>` is implemented for `&str` = help: for that trait implementation, expected `Text`, found `Integer` ``` which makes it much easier for users to understand that they are facing a type mismatch. Other explored example usages included * This standard library error message: rust-lang#128008 * That bevy derived example: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/e1f306899514ea80abc1d1c9f6a57762afb304a3/tests/ui/diagnostic_namespace/do_not_recommend/supress_suggestions_in_help.rs (No more tuple pyramids) Fixes rust-lang#51992
weiznich
added a commit
to weiznich/rust
that referenced
this issue
Oct 28, 2024
This commit seeks to stabilize the `#[diagnostic::do_not_recommend]` attribute. This attribute was first proposed as `#[do_not_recommend`] attribute in RFC 2397 (rust-lang/rfcs#2397). It gives the crate authors the ability to not suggest to the compiler to not show certain traits in it's error messages. With the presence of the `#[diagnostic]` tool attribute namespace it was decided to move the attribute there, as that lowers the amount of guarantees the compiler needs to give about the exact way this influences error messages. It turns the attribute into a hint which can be ignored. In addition to the original proposed functionality this attribute now also hides the marked trait in help messages ("This trait is implemented by: "). The attribute does not accept any argument and can only be placed on trait implementations. If it is placed somewhere else a lint warning is emitted and the attribute is otherwise ignored. If an argument is detected a lint warning is emitted and the argument is ignored. This follows the rules outlined by the diagnostic namespace. This attribute allows crates like diesel to improve their error messages drastically. The most common example here is the following error message: ``` error[E0277]: the trait bound `&str: Expression` is not satisfied --> /home/weiznich/Documents/rust/rust/tests/ui/diagnostic_namespace/do_not_recommend.rs:53:15 | LL | SelectInt.check("bar"); | ^^^^^ the trait `Expression` is not implemented for `&str`, which is required by `&str: AsExpression<Integer>` | = help: the following other types implement trait `Expression`: Bound<T> SelectInt note: required for `&str` to implement `AsExpression<Integer>` --> /home/weiznich/Documents/rust/rust/tests/ui/diagnostic_namespace/do_not_recommend.rs:26:13 | LL | impl<T, ST> AsExpression<ST> for T | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ LL | where LL | T: Expression<SqlType = ST>, | ------------------------ unsatisfied trait bound introduced here ``` By applying the new attribute to the wild card trait implementation of `AsExpression` for `T: Expression` the error message becomes: ``` error[E0277]: the trait bound `&str: AsExpression<Integer>` is not satisfied --> $DIR/as_expression.rs:55:15 | LL | SelectInt.check("bar"); | ^^^^^ the trait `AsExpression<Integer>` is not implemented for `&str` | = help: the trait `AsExpression<Text>` is implemented for `&str` = help: for that trait implementation, expected `Text`, found `Integer` ``` which makes it much easier for users to understand that they are facing a type mismatch. Other explored example usages included * This standard library error message: rust-lang#128008 * That bevy derived example: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/e1f306899514ea80abc1d1c9f6a57762afb304a3/tests/ui/diagnostic_namespace/do_not_recommend/supress_suggestions_in_help.rs (No more tuple pyramids) Fixes rust-lang#51992
weiznich
added a commit
to weiznich/rust
that referenced
this issue
Nov 6, 2024
This commit seeks to stabilize the `#[diagnostic::do_not_recommend]` attribute. This attribute was first proposed as `#[do_not_recommend`] attribute in RFC 2397 (rust-lang/rfcs#2397). It gives the crate authors the ability to not suggest to the compiler to not show certain traits in it's error messages. With the presence of the `#[diagnostic]` tool attribute namespace it was decided to move the attribute there, as that lowers the amount of guarantees the compiler needs to give about the exact way this influences error messages. It turns the attribute into a hint which can be ignored. In addition to the original proposed functionality this attribute now also hides the marked trait in help messages ("This trait is implemented by: "). The attribute does not accept any argument and can only be placed on trait implementations. If it is placed somewhere else a lint warning is emitted and the attribute is otherwise ignored. If an argument is detected a lint warning is emitted and the argument is ignored. This follows the rules outlined by the diagnostic namespace. This attribute allows crates like diesel to improve their error messages drastically. The most common example here is the following error message: ``` error[E0277]: the trait bound `&str: Expression` is not satisfied --> /home/weiznich/Documents/rust/rust/tests/ui/diagnostic_namespace/do_not_recommend.rs:53:15 | LL | SelectInt.check("bar"); | ^^^^^ the trait `Expression` is not implemented for `&str`, which is required by `&str: AsExpression<Integer>` | = help: the following other types implement trait `Expression`: Bound<T> SelectInt note: required for `&str` to implement `AsExpression<Integer>` --> /home/weiznich/Documents/rust/rust/tests/ui/diagnostic_namespace/do_not_recommend.rs:26:13 | LL | impl<T, ST> AsExpression<ST> for T | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ LL | where LL | T: Expression<SqlType = ST>, | ------------------------ unsatisfied trait bound introduced here ``` By applying the new attribute to the wild card trait implementation of `AsExpression` for `T: Expression` the error message becomes: ``` error[E0277]: the trait bound `&str: AsExpression<Integer>` is not satisfied --> $DIR/as_expression.rs:55:15 | LL | SelectInt.check("bar"); | ^^^^^ the trait `AsExpression<Integer>` is not implemented for `&str` | = help: the trait `AsExpression<Text>` is implemented for `&str` = help: for that trait implementation, expected `Text`, found `Integer` ``` which makes it much easier for users to understand that they are facing a type mismatch. Other explored example usages included * This standard library error message: rust-lang#128008 * That bevy derived example: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/e1f306899514ea80abc1d1c9f6a57762afb304a3/tests/ui/diagnostic_namespace/do_not_recommend/supress_suggestions_in_help.rs (No more tuple pyramids) Fixes rust-lang#51992
weiznich
added a commit
to weiznich/rust
that referenced
this issue
Nov 18, 2024
This commit seeks to stabilize the `#[diagnostic::do_not_recommend]` attribute. This attribute was first proposed as `#[do_not_recommend`] attribute in RFC 2397 (rust-lang/rfcs#2397). It gives the crate authors the ability to not suggest to the compiler to not show certain traits in it's error messages. With the presence of the `#[diagnostic]` tool attribute namespace it was decided to move the attribute there, as that lowers the amount of guarantees the compiler needs to give about the exact way this influences error messages. It turns the attribute into a hint which can be ignored. In addition to the original proposed functionality this attribute now also hides the marked trait in help messages ("This trait is implemented by: "). The attribute does not accept any argument and can only be placed on trait implementations. If it is placed somewhere else a lint warning is emitted and the attribute is otherwise ignored. If an argument is detected a lint warning is emitted and the argument is ignored. This follows the rules outlined by the diagnostic namespace. This attribute allows crates like diesel to improve their error messages drastically. The most common example here is the following error message: ``` error[E0277]: the trait bound `&str: Expression` is not satisfied --> /home/weiznich/Documents/rust/rust/tests/ui/diagnostic_namespace/do_not_recommend.rs:53:15 | LL | SelectInt.check("bar"); | ^^^^^ the trait `Expression` is not implemented for `&str`, which is required by `&str: AsExpression<Integer>` | = help: the following other types implement trait `Expression`: Bound<T> SelectInt note: required for `&str` to implement `AsExpression<Integer>` --> /home/weiznich/Documents/rust/rust/tests/ui/diagnostic_namespace/do_not_recommend.rs:26:13 | LL | impl<T, ST> AsExpression<ST> for T | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ LL | where LL | T: Expression<SqlType = ST>, | ------------------------ unsatisfied trait bound introduced here ``` By applying the new attribute to the wild card trait implementation of `AsExpression` for `T: Expression` the error message becomes: ``` error[E0277]: the trait bound `&str: AsExpression<Integer>` is not satisfied --> $DIR/as_expression.rs:55:15 | LL | SelectInt.check("bar"); | ^^^^^ the trait `AsExpression<Integer>` is not implemented for `&str` | = help: the trait `AsExpression<Text>` is implemented for `&str` = help: for that trait implementation, expected `Text`, found `Integer` ``` which makes it much easier for users to understand that they are facing a type mismatch. Other explored example usages included * This standard library error message: rust-lang#128008 * That bevy derived example: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/e1f306899514ea80abc1d1c9f6a57762afb304a3/tests/ui/diagnostic_namespace/do_not_recommend/supress_suggestions_in_help.rs (No more tuple pyramids) Fixes rust-lang#51992
weiznich
added a commit
to weiznich/rust
that referenced
this issue
Nov 30, 2024
This commit seeks to stabilize the `#[diagnostic::do_not_recommend]` attribute. This attribute was first proposed as `#[do_not_recommend`] attribute in RFC 2397 (rust-lang/rfcs#2397). It gives the crate authors the ability to not suggest to the compiler to not show certain traits in it's error messages. With the presence of the `#[diagnostic]` tool attribute namespace it was decided to move the attribute there, as that lowers the amount of guarantees the compiler needs to give about the exact way this influences error messages. It turns the attribute into a hint which can be ignored. In addition to the original proposed functionality this attribute now also hides the marked trait in help messages ("This trait is implemented by: "). The attribute does not accept any argument and can only be placed on trait implementations. If it is placed somewhere else a lint warning is emitted and the attribute is otherwise ignored. If an argument is detected a lint warning is emitted and the argument is ignored. This follows the rules outlined by the diagnostic namespace. This attribute allows crates like diesel to improve their error messages drastically. The most common example here is the following error message: ``` error[E0277]: the trait bound `&str: Expression` is not satisfied --> /home/weiznich/Documents/rust/rust/tests/ui/diagnostic_namespace/do_not_recommend.rs:53:15 | LL | SelectInt.check("bar"); | ^^^^^ the trait `Expression` is not implemented for `&str`, which is required by `&str: AsExpression<Integer>` | = help: the following other types implement trait `Expression`: Bound<T> SelectInt note: required for `&str` to implement `AsExpression<Integer>` --> /home/weiznich/Documents/rust/rust/tests/ui/diagnostic_namespace/do_not_recommend.rs:26:13 | LL | impl<T, ST> AsExpression<ST> for T | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ LL | where LL | T: Expression<SqlType = ST>, | ------------------------ unsatisfied trait bound introduced here ``` By applying the new attribute to the wild card trait implementation of `AsExpression` for `T: Expression` the error message becomes: ``` error[E0277]: the trait bound `&str: AsExpression<Integer>` is not satisfied --> $DIR/as_expression.rs:55:15 | LL | SelectInt.check("bar"); | ^^^^^ the trait `AsExpression<Integer>` is not implemented for `&str` | = help: the trait `AsExpression<Text>` is implemented for `&str` = help: for that trait implementation, expected `Text`, found `Integer` ``` which makes it much easier for users to understand that they are facing a type mismatch. Other explored example usages included * This standard library error message: rust-lang#128008 * That bevy derived example: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/e1f306899514ea80abc1d1c9f6a57762afb304a3/tests/ui/diagnostic_namespace/do_not_recommend/supress_suggestions_in_help.rs (No more tuple pyramids) Fixes rust-lang#51992
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
This is a tracking issue for the RFC "Introduce
#[do_not_recommend]to control errors for trait impls" (rust-lang/rfcs#2397).Steps:
Unresolved questions:
#[do_not_recommend]? (See RFC for some suggestions)implementation history:
#[do_not_recommend]attribute if present #124708#[diagnostic::do_not_recommend]support #125717#[do_not_recommend]to the#[diagnostic]namespace #125326#[diagnostic::do_not_recommend]to supress trait impls in suggestions as well #127598The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: