Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding support for extending objects with new fields #538

Closed
lkuper opened this issue Jun 21, 2011 · 1 comment
Closed

Adding support for extending objects with new fields #538

lkuper opened this issue Jun 21, 2011 · 1 comment

Comments

@lkuper
Copy link
Contributor

lkuper commented Jun 21, 2011

This will be a pretty big feature, involving the parser and, importantly, the resolver as well as the typechecking and translation passes. Currently xfail'd test: src/test/run-pass/anon-objs-with-fields.rs.

@ghost ghost assigned lkuper Jun 21, 2011
lkuper added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 21, 2011
into four separate issues (#538, #539, #540, #543) with corresponding
tests.
@lkuper
Copy link
Contributor Author

lkuper commented Jan 13, 2012

Since the object system is no more, this bug is no longer relevant -- closing.

@lkuper lkuper closed this as completed Jan 13, 2012
@lkuper lkuper removed their assignment Jun 16, 2014
keeperofdakeys pushed a commit to keeperofdakeys/rust that referenced this issue Dec 12, 2017
Add and fix tests for {i686, aarch64}-linux-android targets

I think that these changes do not breaks compatibility.

There are some types and constants changes to i686 and aarch64, but I see these changes as bug fixes instead of breaking changes. Also the type time64_t was remove from aarch64 because it is not defined in this arch.

Fixes rust-lang#536
kazcw pushed a commit to kazcw/rust that referenced this issue Oct 23, 2018
Even if it is unlikely to happen the VSX instructions can be executed in
32bit mode just as well.
pdietl pushed a commit to pdietl/rust that referenced this issue Apr 23, 2020
ZuseZ4 pushed a commit to EnzymeAD/rust that referenced this issue Mar 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant