-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 10 pull requests #100805
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 10 pull requests #100805
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
it will be 4076 (from 5.4) or 128.
…being to confirm that the entries actually correspond to what is specified in each of the respective ABIs... updated to incorporate feedback: fix x86_64/i686 tests to use correct name for the corresponding llvm component.
incorporated review feedback, with comment explaining why this is calling CC instead of COMPILE_OBJ or NATIVE_STATICLIB. As drive-by, removed some other unnecessary commands from the recipe.
parameterized on target details to decide value-extension policy on calls, in order to address how Apple's aarch64 ABI differs from that on Linux and Windows. Updated to incorporate review feedback: adjust comment on new enum specifying param extension policy. Updated to incorporate review feedback: shorten enum names and those of its variants to make it less unwieldy. placate tidy.
…t_test_helpers. This instance is almost certainly insufficient because we need to force optimization flags for both the C and Rust sides of the code. but lets find out for sure.
Co-authored-by: Wesley Wiser <wwiser@gmail.com>
This reverts commit 16e10bf. # Conflicts: # compiler/rustc_target/src/spec/apple_sdk_base.rs
… the extension operation depending on target architecture.
remove unnecessary string searchings for checking if function arguments have `&` and `&mut`
…ll-abi-does-not-zeroext, r=wesleywiser Aarch64 call abi does not zeroext (and one cannot assume it does so) Fix rust-lang#97463
net listen backlog set to negative on Linux. it will be 4076 (from 5.4) or 128.
…ochenkov Reenable disabled early syntax gates as future-incompatibility lints - MCP: rust-lang/compiler-team#535 The approach taken by this PR is - Introduce a new lint, `unstable_syntax_pre_expansion`, and reenable the early syntax gates to emit it - Use the diagnostic stashing mechanism to stash warnings the early warnings - When the hard error occurs post expansion, steal and cancel the early warning - Don't display any stashed warnings if errors are present to avoid the same noise problem that hiding type ascription errors is avoiding Commits are working commits, but in a coherent steps-to-implement manner. Can be squashed if desired. The preexisting `soft_unstable` lint seems like it would've been a good fit, but it is deny-by-default (appropriate for `#[bench]`) and these gates should be introduced as warn-by-default. It may be desirable to change the stash mechanism's behavior to not flush lint errors in the presence of other errors either (like is done for warnings here), but upgrading a stash-using lint from warn to error perhaps is enough of a request to see the lint that they shouldn't be hidden; additionally, fixing the last error to get new errors thrown at you always feels bad, so if we know the lint errors are present, we should show them. Using a new flag/mechanism for a "weak diagnostic" which is suppressed by other errors may also be desirable over assuming any stashed warnings are "weak," but this is the first user of stashing warnings and seems an appropriate use of stashing (it follows the "know more later to refine the diagnostic" pattern; here we learn that it's in a compiled position) so we get to define what it means to stash a non-hard-error diagnostic. cc ````@petrochenkov```` (seconded MCP)
add miri-test-libstd support to libstd - The first commit mirrors what we already have in liballoc. - The second commit adds some regression tests that only really make sense to be run in Miri, since they rely on Miri's extra checks to detect anything. - The third commit makes the MPSC tests work in reasonable time in Miri by reducing iteration counts. - The fourth commit silences some warnings due to code being disabled with `cfg(miri)`
…lcnr Ban references to `Self` in trait object substs for projection predicates too. Fixes rust-lang#100484 Fixes rust-lang#100485 r? ```@lcnr```
Revert "Revert "Allow dynamic linking for iOS/tvOS targets."" This reverts commit 16e10bf (PR rust-lang#77716). The original original PR enabled `cdylib` builds for iOS. However this caused problems because: > This new feature in Rust 1.46 added a lot of headache for iOS builds with cdylib targets. cdylib target is near impossible to build if you are using any crate with native dependencies (ex. openssl, libsodium, zmq). You can't just find .so files for all architectures to perform correct linking. Usual workflow is the following: > > 1. You build staticlib and rely that native dependencies will be linked as frameworks later > 2. You setup right cocoapods in ObjectiveC/Swift wrapper. > > As cargo doesn't support platform-dependent crate types rust-lang#4881 as a result a lot of projects now broken on Rust 1.46 However, this will be soon a thing of the past since 1.64 brings us the long awaited much anticipated `--crate-type` flag. > I see that this got merged recently: rust-lang/cargo#10083. The --crate-type flag will get stabilized in 1.64. In 1.64, you could still get a successful iOS staticlib with cargo build --crate-type=statclib even if the crate has cdylib targets too. If I'm not mistaken, this solves the problem too so this PR could be reverted in 1.64 with relatively little headache. So summing up, I think this PR can be reverted in 1.64. 🤞
[rustdoc] Fix item info display Fixes rust-lang#100369. The solution I came up with was simply to wrap the "text part" of the `item-info` into another span so that `flex` wouldn't mess with it. Live demo is [here](https://rustdoc.crud.net/imperio/fix-item-info/foo/struct.ItemInfo.html). r? `@jsha`
…o-trait-assoc-item, r=cjgillot Suggest adding a reference to a trait assoc item fixes rust-lang#100289
…me, r=TaKO8Ki elaborate how revisions work with FileCheck stuff in src/test/codegen elaborate how revisions work with FileCheck stuff in src/test/codegen
…searching, r=compiler-errors Refactor: remove unnecessary string searchings This patch removes unnecessary string searchings for checking if function arguments have `&` and `&mut`.
rustbot
added
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Aug 20, 2022
@bors r+ rollup=never p=10 |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Aug 20, 2022
⌛ Testing commit d0a7179 with merge 5f91df5ae834e867246d834919ee03da65adfc36... |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Aug 20, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
Self
in trait object substs for projection predicates too. #100500 (Ban references toSelf
in trait object substs for projection predicates too.)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup