Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add -api-level to pm command #101343

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 7, 2022
Merged

Add -api-level to pm command #101343

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 7, 2022

Conversation

diminishedprime
Copy link
Contributor

As of ~Aug 30th, pm build commands require an api-level flag. This flag should match the fuchsia api-level that's being targeted by the code. Since this is dependent on the version of the SDK that's being used, we may want to change this to something a bit more robust in the future.

As of ~Aug 30th, `pm build` commands require an `api-level` flag. This flag should match the fuchsia api-level that's being targeted by the code. Since this is dependent on the version of the SDK that's being used, we may want to change this to something a bit more robust in the future.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @JohnTitor

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 2, 2022
@diminishedprime
Copy link
Contributor Author

r? @andrewpollack

Co-authored-by: Andrew Pollack <andrewpkq@gmail.com>
@andrewpollack
Copy link
Member

LGTM. Thank you for taking charge on the api-level flag inclusion!

@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

r? @tmandry

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned tmandry and unassigned JohnTitor Sep 6, 2022
@tmandry
Copy link
Member

tmandry commented Sep 7, 2022

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 7, 2022

📌 Commit 056d633 has been approved by tmandry

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 7, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2022
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 14 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#101343 (Add -api-level to pm command)
 - rust-lang#101416 (stdio: Document no support for writing to non-blocking stdio/stderr)
 - rust-lang#101435 (Remove unnecessary `EMIT_MIR_FOR_EACH_BITWIDTH`)
 - rust-lang#101493 (Pass ImplTraitContext as &mut to avoid the need of ImplTraitContext::reborrow)
 - rust-lang#101502 (Do not suggest a semicolon for a macro without `!`)
 - rust-lang#101503 (Add debug calls)
 - rust-lang#101506 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS `#main-content > .since`)
 - rust-lang#101507 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS `#main-content > table td`)
 - rust-lang#101521 (Rustdoc-Json: More accurate struct type.)
 - rust-lang#101525 (Fix typo in pass_manager.rs)
 - rust-lang#101534 (rustdoc: remove unused mobile CSS `.rustdoc { flex-direction }`)
 - rust-lang#101535 (Fix error printing mistake in tidy)
 - rust-lang#101536 (Add documentation for Attr::is_doc_comment)
 - rust-lang#101538 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS `.content .methods > div`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 870a46d into rust-lang:master Sep 7, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.65.0 milestone Sep 7, 2022
@tmandry tmandry added the O-fuchsia Operating system: Fuchsia label May 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
O-fuchsia Operating system: Fuchsia S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants