-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
stop special-casing 'static
in evaluation
#102472
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
…, r=jackh726 make `order_dependent_trait_objects` show up in future-breakage reports tried to change it to a hard error in rust-lang#102474 but breaking the more than 1000 dependents of `traitobject` doesn't feel great 😅 This lint has existed since more than 3 years now and the way this is currently implemented is buggy and will break with rust-lang#102472. imo we should upgrade it to also report for dependencies and maybe also backport this to beta. Then after maybe 2-3 stable versions I would like to finally convert this lint to a hard error.
…, r=jackh726 make `order_dependent_trait_objects` show up in future-breakage reports tried to change it to a hard error in rust-lang#102474 but breaking the more than 1000 dependents of `traitobject` doesn't feel great 😅 This lint has existed since more than 3 years now and the way this is currently implemented is buggy and will break with rust-lang#102472. imo we should upgrade it to also report for dependencies and maybe also backport this to beta. Then after maybe 2-3 stable versions I would like to finally convert this lint to a hard error.
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #103375) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #104758) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
@rustbot label: -T-compiler +T-types |
@lcnr what's the status of this? |
Given this only changes unstable marker trait behavior, fine to land with open issue referenced in known bug |
Could not assign reviewer from: |
@bors r+ |
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#91793 (socket ancillary data implementation for FreeBSD (from 13 and above).) - rust-lang#92284 (Change advance(_back)_by to return the remainder instead of the number of processed elements) - rust-lang#102472 (stop special-casing `'static` in evaluation) - rust-lang#108480 (Use Rayon's TLV directly) - rust-lang#109321 (Erase impl regions when checking for impossible to eagerly monomorphize items) - rust-lang#109470 (Correctly substitute GAT's type used in `normalize_param_env` in `check_type_bounds`) - rust-lang#109562 (Update ar_archive_writer to 0.1.3) - rust-lang#109629 (remove obsolete `givens` from regionck) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
For triage purposes: from the results in the rollup where this PR landed, and the results in a revert. @rustbot label: +perf-regression |
fixes #102360
I have no idea whether this actually removed all places where
'static
matters. Without canonicalization it's very easy to accidentally rely on'static
again. Blocked on changing theorder_dependent_trait_objects
future-compat lint to a hard errorr? @nikomatsakis