-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clean up rustdoc startup #102769
Merged
Merged
Clean up rustdoc startup #102769
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
021d1fb
Clean up rustdoc startup.
nnethercote 2a62c92
Merge `main_options` into `main_args`.
nnethercote 134e9d3
Inline and remove `scoped_thread`.
nnethercote dcc194e
Reduce visibility of some functions.
nnethercote b6ae145
Inline and remove `create_compiler_and_run`.
nnethercote ec409f9
Apply `Lrc` later to `sess` and `codegen_backend`.
nnethercote 63db9e5
Replace a `spawn_unchecked` with `spawn_scoped`.
nnethercote 38988e6
Use `interface::run_compiler` for `markdown::render`.
nnethercote ca2561a
Avoid cloning `RenderOptions`.
nnethercote File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please never inline safe functions that contain
unsafe
code!(Also, not as important here, but "single call site" is a really bad metric, unless you can find where other callsites were removed in the past or anything of the worst - often single-call-site functions are separate for semantic reasons!)
The purpose of such a function is to encapsulate the unsafety. Inlining could cause unsound interactions with surrounding code in the caller! And increases complexity in analyzing the correctness of the code, regardless of what you may think about some subject readability metric.
In the end this was fine because of the move to the new scoped threads, but this is pretty dangerous to do in the first place, and IMO should've been a PR on its own anyway (that has "scoped threads" or similar in the PR title, assuming going the full route to the new scoped thread API).