Rollup of 6 pull requests

[Dylan-DPC]

Successful merges:

• Mention const and lifetime parameters in error E0207 #103757 (Mention const and lifetime parameters in error E0207)
• Don't silently eat label before block in block-like expr #103986 (Don't silently eat label before block in block-like expr)
• Move some tests to more reasonable directories #104003 (Move some tests to more reasonable directories)
• Normalize types when deducing closure signature from supertraits #104038 (Normalize types when deducing closure signature from supertraits)
• Fix resolution_failure ICE #104052 (Fix resolution_failure ICE)
• Modify comment syntax error #104090 (Modify comment syntax error)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

[Dylan-DPC]

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

[bors]

📌 Commit 81b8db2 has been approved by Dylan-DPC

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 81b8db2 with merge 68f7729...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Dylan-DPC
Pushing 68f7729 to master...

[rust-timer]

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#	Perf Build Sha
#104090	696df353ddcd5994547e58c03502807421fd1435
#104052	316ffb9b754e17b5fc377397beccade929d18ee8
#104038	56fce625552ef19a2497659936a89087b49296ff
#104003	cc8720d56116da3c63d3955d43130808e9370a6c
#103986	cb0fcada122c56ce8e0b41ebf0e22b310bd7abb8
#103757	100295cee2a63226f511e99f4d19a8bc6082a150

previous master: 391ba78ab4

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (68f7729): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.3%	[0.3%, 0.3%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.4%	[-0.4%, -0.4%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.8%	[0.7%, 0.8%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.8%	[3.8%, 3.8%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.8%	[-1.8%, -1.8%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.1%	[-1.8%, 0.8%]	3

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.5%	[0.4%, 0.5%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.5%	[-0.5%, -0.5%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.1%	[-0.5%, 0.5%]	3