Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

rustdoc: Add copy to the description of repeat #104112

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2022
Merged

rustdoc: Add copy to the description of repeat #104112

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2022

Conversation

yancyribbens
Copy link
Contributor

Small nit, but it's more clear to say copy here instead of defining repeat in terms of itself.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 7, 2022

r? @joshtriplett

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 7, 2022
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 7, 2022

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

Sorry for the delay, now it looks great to me, thank you.
@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 20, 2022

📌 Commit f4ffdbf has been approved by JohnTitor

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 20, 2022
@JohnTitor JohnTitor mentioned this pull request Nov 20, 2022
Merged
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2022
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#104629 - JohnTitor:rollup-vp3m98i, r=JohnTitor
2ed65da 
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#103901 (Add tracking issue for `const_arguments_as_str`)
 - rust-lang#104112 (rustdoc: Add copy to the description of repeat)
 - rust-lang#104435 (`VecDeque::resize` should re-use the buffer in the passed-in element)
 - rust-lang#104467 (Fix substraction with overflow in `wrong_number_of_generic_args.rs`)
 - rust-lang#104608 (Cleanup macro matching recovery)
 - rust-lang#104626 (Fix doctest errors related to rustc_middle)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit e69b842 into rust-lang:master Nov 20, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.67.0 milestone Nov 20, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@JohnTitor JohnTitor JohnTitor approved these changes

Assignees

@joshtriplett joshtriplett

Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.67.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@yancyribbens @rustbot @JohnTitor @bors @joshtriplett