Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reverts check done by #100757 #104610

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 24, 2022
Merged

Reverts check done by #100757 #104610

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 24, 2022

Conversation

ouz-a
Copy link
Contributor

@ouz-a ouz-a commented Nov 19, 2022

As my fix caused more issues than it resolved it's better to revert it.
( #103274 #104322 #104606)

r? @compiler-errors

Reverts #100757
Reopens #95134

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 19, 2022
@@ -1,28 +0,0 @@
// build-fail
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be kept. If it ICEs, then it can be tagged as // known-bug: #### and you need to add // failure-status: 101 and // dont-check-compiler-stderr to account for the ICE.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 22, 2022

📌 Commit 701970e has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 22, 2022
@WaffleLapkin
Copy link
Member

If this fixes the mentioned issues, shouldn't this also add tests for them?

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

If this fixes the mentioned issues, shouldn't this also add tests for them?

Ideally yes, but none of them have minimizations 🤷

They seem like pretty large projects too, and #104606 is from a private codebase 😢

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 24, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 701970e with merge fd815a5...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 24, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: compiler-errors
Pushing fd815a5 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Nov 24, 2022
@bors bors merged commit fd815a5 into rust-lang:master Nov 24, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.67.0 milestone Nov 24, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (fd815a5): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.4% [0.4%, 0.4%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
3.5% [3.5%, 3.5%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.8% [-0.8%, -0.8%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.5% [2.3%, 2.9%] 3
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

@weiznich
Copy link
Contributor

@compiler-errors #104606 is not really related to this fix. It's a ICE not a type check regression. It only mentions #104322 as that error forces me to use 1.64. For #104322 I've provided a reproducible example, although that's definitively not minimal due to using diesel and wundergraph.

@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

This also reopens #92004 and #92470 which now crash again

@compiler-errors compiler-errors added the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Nov 26, 2022
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Nominating for beta backport discussion. It really sucks we don't have a MCVE for the test suite for this, but given that this is a PR revert and not adding new logic, it's less risky, I feel. Anyways, we should discuss this regardless.

@apiraino
Copy link
Contributor

apiraino commented Dec 1, 2022

Beta backport accepted as per compiler team on Zulip

@rustbot label +beta-accepted

@rustbot rustbot added the beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Dec 1, 2022
@pietroalbini pietroalbini removed the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Dec 11, 2022
@ouz-a ouz-a deleted the revert-overflow branch December 12, 2022 13:54
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2022
…troalbini

[stable] Prepare 1.66.0 release

This PR prepares the artifacts for the 1.66.0 release. The following PRs have been backported:

* rust-lang#104782
* rust-lang#105023
* rust-lang#104558
* rust-lang#104610
* rust-lang#103989
* rust-lang#104650
* rust-lang#105539
* rust-lang#105477

r? `@ghost`
Aaron1011 pushed a commit to Aaron1011/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2023
…rors

Reverts check done by rust-lang#100757

As my `fix` caused more issues than it resolved it's better to revert it.
( rust-lang#103274 rust-lang#104322 rust-lang#104606)

r? `@compiler-errors`

Reopens rust-lang#95134
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants