-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reverts check done by #100757 #104610
Reverts check done by #100757 #104610
Conversation
@@ -1,28 +0,0 @@ | |||
// build-fail |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should be kept. If it ICEs, then it can be tagged as // known-bug: ####
and you need to add // failure-status: 101
and // dont-check-compiler-stderr
to account for the ICE.
@bors r+ rollup=never |
If this fixes the mentioned issues, shouldn't this also add tests for them? |
Ideally yes, but none of them have minimizations 🤷 They seem like pretty large projects too, and #104606 is from a private codebase 😢 |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (fd815a5): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
|
@compiler-errors #104606 is not really related to this fix. It's a ICE not a type check regression. It only mentions #104322 as that error forces me to use 1.64. For #104322 I've provided a reproducible example, although that's definitively not minimal due to using diesel and wundergraph. |
Nominating for beta backport discussion. It really sucks we don't have a MCVE for the test suite for this, but given that this is a PR revert and not adding new logic, it's less risky, I feel. Anyways, we should discuss this regardless. |
…troalbini [stable] Prepare 1.66.0 release This PR prepares the artifacts for the 1.66.0 release. The following PRs have been backported: * rust-lang#104782 * rust-lang#105023 * rust-lang#104558 * rust-lang#104610 * rust-lang#103989 * rust-lang#104650 * rust-lang#105539 * rust-lang#105477 r? `@ghost`
…rors Reverts check done by rust-lang#100757 As my `fix` caused more issues than it resolved it's better to revert it. ( rust-lang#103274 rust-lang#104322 rust-lang#104606) r? `@compiler-errors` Reopens rust-lang#95134
As my
fix
caused more issues than it resolved it's better to revert it.( #103274 #104322 #104606)
r? @compiler-errors
Reverts #100757
Reopens #95134