Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove wrong note for short circuiting operators #105522

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2022

Conversation

est31
Copy link
Member

@est31 est31 commented Dec 10, 2022

They are representable by traits, even if the short-circuiting behaviour requires a different approach than the non-short-circuiting operators. For an example proposal, see the postponed RFC 2722. As it is not accurate, remove most of the note.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 10, 2022

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 10, 2022
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 10, 2022

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@est31
Copy link
Member Author

est31 commented Dec 10, 2022

cc @scottmcm

They *are* representable by traits, even if the short-circuiting
behaviour requires a different approach than the non-short-circuiting
operators. For an example proposal, see the postponed RFC 2722.
As it is not accurate, reword the note.
@scottmcm
Copy link
Member

r? @scottmcm
@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 10, 2022

📌 Commit f069e71 has been approved by scottmcm

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rustbot rustbot assigned scottmcm and unassigned Mark-Simulacrum Dec 10, 2022
@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 10, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2022
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#98391 (Reimplement std's thread parker on top of events on SGX)
 - rust-lang#104019 (Compute generator sizes with `-Zprint_type_sizes`)
 - rust-lang#104512 (Set `download-ci-llvm = "if-available"` by default when `channel = dev`)
 - rust-lang#104901 (Implement masking in FileType comparison on Unix)
 - rust-lang#105082 (Fix Async Generator ABI)
 - rust-lang#105109 (Add LLVM KCFI support to the Rust compiler)
 - rust-lang#105505 (Don't warn about unused parens when they are used by yeet expr)
 - rust-lang#105514 (Introduce `Span::is_visible`)
 - rust-lang#105516 (Update cargo)
 - rust-lang#105522 (Remove wrong note for short circuiting operators)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit f6c2add into rust-lang:master Dec 10, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.68.0 milestone Dec 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants