Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 7 pull requests #107021

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Jan 18, 2023
Merged

Rollup of 7 pull requests #107021

merged 18 commits into from
Jan 18, 2023

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

atouchet and others added 18 commits December 28, 2022 21:47
Improve Markdown styling in README

Update Readme to use consistent line lengths. Also update some formatting and links. (Followup to rust-lang#105553).

r? ``@workingjubilee``
…tebank

Add 'static lifetime suggestion when GAT implied 'static requirement from HRTB

Fix for issue rust-lang#105507

The problem:
When generic associated types (GATs) are from higher-ranked trait bounds (HRTB), they are implied 'static requirement (see
[Implied 'static requirement from higher-ranked trait bounds](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2022/10/28/gats-stabilization.html#implied-static-requirement-from-higher-ranked-trait-bounds) for more details). If the user did not explicitly specify the `'static` lifetime when using the GAT, the current error message will only point out the type `does not live long enough` where the type is used, but not where the GAT is specified and how to fix the problem.

The solution:
Add notes at the span where the problematic GATs are specified and suggestions of how to fix the problem by adding `'static` lifetime at the right spans.
…piler-errors

dont randomly use `_` to print out const generic arguments

const generics seem to get printed out as `_` for no reason a lot of the time, as someone who spends a lot of time with const generics this has gotten ✨ very annoying ✨. Latest example would be rust-lang#106423 where the ICE messaged formatted a `ty::Const` containing no infer vars, as `_`.

For some reason printing of the const argument on arrays was custom instead of using the existing logic for printing `ty::Const`. Additionally the existing logic for printing `ty::Const` would print out `_` for anon consts that are in a separate crate leading to weird diagnostics (see second commit). There ought to be less cases of consts randomly getting printed as `_` hiding valuable info now.
…thomcc

Remove unused `#![feature(box_syntax)]` in `alloc`
…est, r=cuviper

bump failing assembly & codegen tests from LLVM 14 to LLVM 15

These tests need LLVM 15.

Found by ```@Robert-Cunningham``` in rust-lang#100601 (comment)

Passed tests at 006506e93fc80318ebfd7939fe1fd4dc19ecd8cb in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/actions/runs/3942442730/jobs/6746104740.
…div, r=GuillaumeGomez

rustdoc: instead of `.setting-name { width: 100% }`, use default div CSS

This has no discernible change in appearance.
Add heapsort fallback in `select_nth_unstable`

Addresses rust-lang#102451 and rust-lang#106933.

`slice::select_nth_unstable` uses a quick select implementation based on the same pattern defeating quicksort algorithm that `slice::sort_unstable` uses. `slice::sort_unstable` uses a recursion limit and falls back to heapsort if there were too many bad pivot choices, to ensure O(n log n) worst case running time (known as introsort). However, `slice::select_nth_unstable` does not have such a fallback strategy, which leads to it having a worst case running time of O(n²) instead. rust-lang#102451 links to a playground which generates pathological inputs that show this quadratic behavior. On my machine, a randomly generated slice of length `1 << 19` takes ~200µs to calculate its median, whereas a pathological input of the same length takes over 2.5s. This PR adds an iteration limit to `select_nth_unstable`, falling back to heapsort, which ensures an O(n log n) worst case running time (introselect). With this change, there was no noticable slowdown for the random input, but the same pathological input now takes only ~1.2ms. In the future it might be worth implementing something like Median of Medians or Fast Deterministic Selection instead, which guarantee O(n) running time for all possible inputs. I've left this as a `FIXME` for now and only implemented the heapsort fallback to minimize the needed code changes.

I still think we should clarify in the `select_nth_unstable` docs that the worst case running time isn't currently O(n) (the original reason that rust-lang#102451 was opened), but I think it's a lot better to be able to guarantee O(n log n) instead of O(n²) for the worst case.
@rustbot rustbot added A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Jan 18, 2023
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=7

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 18, 2023

📌 Commit 788671c has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 18, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 18, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 788671c with merge 74c1ad5...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 18, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 74c1ad5 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jan 18, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 74c1ad5 into rust-lang:master Jan 18, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.68.0 milestone Jan 18, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Perf Build Sha
#106997 acd57e275fbf92c4a0c86b98d212e2b881b73df8
#106996 7aa434f22717f7df697469523900b802fd28d7cc
#106995 48f5b9d737c3dec6a12abd47f5b2a5934261b3f9
#106992 7226fc68696fe91e8c28c294a04900a4ecbb560d
#106873 87714ab4e8209f76b0473a7ee809f223106b0203
#106747 0fcf6762232d5920b7aee64b9fc2daa616813f78
#106244 dbc5d8aa12d3637f1555104c77873092a97a0260

previous master: aaa9bb9e7b

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (74c1ad5): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.4% [-3.4%, -3.4%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.4% [2.3%, 2.6%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-0dzxfyi branch March 16, 2024 18:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants