Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove unnecessary check for opaque types #107074

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 26, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 1 addition & 6 deletions compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/transform/validate.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ use rustc_middle::mir::{
ProjectionElem, RetagKind, RuntimePhase, Rvalue, SourceScope, Statement, StatementKind,
Terminator, TerminatorKind, UnOp, START_BLOCK,
};
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, InstanceDef, ParamEnv, Ty, TyCtxt, TypeVisitable};
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, InstanceDef, ParamEnv, Ty, TyCtxt};
use rustc_mir_dataflow::impls::MaybeStorageLive;
use rustc_mir_dataflow::storage::always_storage_live_locals;
use rustc_mir_dataflow::{Analysis, ResultsCursor};
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -230,11 +230,6 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
// Equal types, all is good.
return true;
}
// Normalization reveals opaque types, but we may be validating MIR while computing
// said opaque types, causing cycles.
if (src, dest).has_opaque_types() {
return true;
}

crate::util::is_subtype(self.tcx, self.param_env, src, dest)
}
Expand Down