Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify wording on f64::round() and f32::round() #107714

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2023

Conversation

Wilfred
Copy link
Contributor

@Wilfred Wilfred commented Feb 6, 2023

"Round half-way cases" is a little confusing (it's a 'garden path sentence' as it's not immediately clear whether round is an adjective or verb).

Make this sentence longer and clearer.

"Round half-way cases" is a little confusing (it's a 'garden path
sentence' as it's not immediately clear whether round is an adjective
or verb).

Make this sentence longer and clearer.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 6, 2023

r? @m-ou-se

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 6, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 6, 2023

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@m-ou-se
Copy link
Member

m-ou-se commented Feb 6, 2023

Thanks!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 6, 2023

📌 Commit 4a7a9b4 has been approved by m-ou-se

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 6, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#106477 (Refine error spans for "The trait bound `T: Trait` is not satisfied" when passing literal structs/tuples)
 - rust-lang#107596 (Add nicer output to PGO build timer)
 - rust-lang#107692 (Sort Generator `print-type-sizes` according to their yield points)
 - rust-lang#107714 (Clarify wording on f64::round() and f32::round())
 - rust-lang#107720 (end entry paragraph with a period (.))
 - rust-lang#107724 (remove unused rustc_* imports)
 - rust-lang#107725 (Turn MarkdownWithToc into a struct with named fields)
 - rust-lang#107731 (interpret: move discriminant reading and writing to separate file)
 - rust-lang#107735 (Add mailmap for commits made by xes@meta.com)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 7c4e6ed into rust-lang:master Feb 6, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.69.0 milestone Feb 6, 2023
@Wilfred Wilfred deleted the round_docs branch March 29, 2024 20:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants